{
 "library_identifier": "discovery",
 "scope_note": "This library covers discovery methodology source documents spanning the intellectual lineage of how innovation, observation, scientific method, product discovery, systems thinking, institutional design, frontier science, and governed system architecture actually produce insight. It is independent of any post-scraping or content-harvesting workflow. Its job is to supply verified, published, primary or official source anchors from historical and current brilliant minds so downstream CoSuite notebooks, advisors, builders, dossiers, and articles can apply those discovery lenses to any external corpus or amalgamated trend evidence without relying on model memory. Entries are attributed to primary texts, author-controlled pages, publisher pages, official institutional pages, Nobel/Turing pages, standards bodies, or canonical archival reproductions. The library records what each source helps the system see, how it may shape a constructive thesis, and what may not be claimed from it without additional evidence. [2026-06-15 expansion: categories 1-7 expanded with verified primary/official sources and thesis-utility fields; Category 5 populated; Category 4 corrected by adding modern product-discovery sources rather than leaving it dominated by software-programming lineage; existing unverified entries preserved but not promoted.]",
 "categories": [
  {
   "category_id": "category_1_classical_strategy_and_observation",
   "category_title": "CLASSICAL STRATEGY AND OBSERVATION",
   "category_target": "Primary texts and translations of foundational strategy and observation works from classical antiquity through pre-industrial era. Includes Sun Tzu's The Art of War (Project Gutenberg primary text); Laozi's Tao Te Ching (Project Gutenberg primary text); Miyamoto Musashi's Book of Five Rings (Internet Archive accessible reproduction); Toyota Production System primary doctrine pages from the Toyota corporate site (Taiichi Ohno's genchi genbutsu lineage). Entries in this category address discovery through direct observation, situational assessment, indirection, and waste elimination as foundational methodologies that predate and inform modern discovery practice.",
   "max_sources": 10,
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "Aristotle — logic, causality, systems classification",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_1": "Four causes mirror the Direct/Implied/Inferred/Extrapolated binding tiers; syllogism prefigures IRAC.",
     "alt_urls": [
      "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Aristotle"
     ],
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Aristotle — logic, causality, systems classification.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      },
      {
       "url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Aristotle",
       "source_role": "third_party_reference",
       "is_primary_url": false,
       "attesting_party": "www.britannica.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Aristotle — logic, causality, systems classification.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "alt_urls[0]"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Socrates — dialectical questioning / truth testing",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socrates/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_1": "Thesis-relevance test and fabrication cross-examination are Socratic.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socrates/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Socrates — dialectical questioning / truth testing.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Thomas Aquinas — logic + institutional structure",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_1": "Summa Objection->Response->Reply prefigures IRAC; medieval placement flagged for operator.",
     "placement_note": "Medieval; current taxonomy has no medieval category — provisional in cat_1.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Thomas Aquinas — logic + institutional structure.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Sun Tzu — The Art of War",
     "primary_url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/132",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified primary text — canonical archival reproduction",
     "region_context": "China / classical strategy",
     "discovery_mechanism": "situational strategy and terrain assessment",
     "thesis_role": "observation_discipline",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Foundational strategic-assessment text; useful for indirect strategy, terrain, deception, timing, and relative-position analysis.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus shows competition, positioning, asymmetric advantage, timing, indirect action, or strategic restraint.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to frame strategy as relative position and constraints, not mere ambition.",
     "colab_use": "Transforms competitive noise into a situational thesis: what position, timing, terrain, and leverage determine action.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Transforms competitive noise into a situational thesis: what position, timing, terrain, and leverage determine action.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use as evidence that a modern company has strategic advantage; it only supplies an analytical lens.",
     "verification_method": "Project Gutenberg ebook page opened; author, title, translator, public-domain status and eBook number visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "archive_reproduction",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/132",
       "source_role": "archive_reproduction",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.gutenberg.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Sun Tzu — The Art of War.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of situational strategy and terrain assessment as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Laozi — Tao Te Ching",
     "primary_url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/216",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified primary text — canonical archival reproduction",
     "region_context": "China / classical philosophy",
     "discovery_mechanism": "non-coercive systems action",
     "thesis_role": "problem_reframer",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Foundational text for non-force, simplicity, paradox, restraint, and action through system alignment.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus overstates control, speed, force, certainty, or command and needs a restraint/indirection counter-lens.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to test whether the strongest thesis is subtraction, simplification, or reduced friction.",
     "colab_use": "Turns acceleration narratives into a thesis about alignment, simplicity, restraint, and indirect effect.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns acceleration narratives into a thesis about alignment, simplicity, restraint, and indirect effect.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not treat Taoist principle as proof of a business outcome; use only as interpretive lineage.",
     "verification_method": "Project Gutenberg ebook page opened; title, Laozi authorship, alternate title and public-domain status visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "archive_reproduction",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/216",
       "source_role": "archive_reproduction",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.gutenberg.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Laozi — Tao Te Ching.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of non-coercive systems action as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Miyamoto Musashi — The Book of Five Rings",
     "primary_url": "https://archive.org/details/MiyamotoMusashi-BookOfFiveRingsgoRinNoSho",
     "verification_status": "Candidate primary text — archive URL included; verify edition/translation before seal",
     "source_kind": "archival reproduction requiring edition verification",
     "region_context": "Japan / martial strategy",
     "discovery_mechanism": "discipline of timing and situated perception",
     "thesis_role": "observation_discipline",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Applied mastery text for timing, perception, discipline, opponent reading, and strategic embodiment.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus suggests tactical mastery, professionalization, disciplined practice, or strategy under uncertainty.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish technique, timing, perception, and discipline rather than collapsing them into 'execution'.",
     "colab_use": "Turns professionalization themes into an argument about trained perception and repeatable timing.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns professionalization themes into an argument about trained perception and repeatable timing.",
     "claim_boundary": "Use only as a classical analogy unless a separate modern source supports operational claims.",
     "verification_method": "URL opened or confirmed against official/primary source during 2026-06-15 expansion pass.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate primary text — archive URL included; verify edition/translation before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "candidate_requires_verification",
     "rule_2_source_class": "archive_reproduction",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://archive.org/details/MiyamotoMusashi-BookOfFiveRingsgoRinNoSho",
       "source_role": "archive_reproduction",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "archive.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Miyamoto Musashi — The Book of Five Rings.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "candidate_requires_verification",
       "verified_on": "",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discipline of timing and situated perception as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  },
  {
   "category_id": "category_2_renaissance_and_enlightenment_observation",
   "category_title": "RENAISSANCE AND ENLIGHTENMENT OBSERVATION",
   "category_target": "Primary texts of Renaissance and Enlightenment-era observation, probability, and meta-computation. Includes Leonardo da Vinci's Notebooks (Project Gutenberg compiled primary text); Pascal's Pensees and probability correspondence (Project Gutenberg primary text plus archival pathway for the probability letters); Ada Lovelace's Notes on the Analytical Engine (fourmilab.ch verified reproduction). Entries address visual discovery through pattern recording, expected-value reasoning under uncertainty, and meta-use thinking that extends tools beyond original purpose — discovery practices that establish the empirical-rational foundation modern methodology builds on.",
   "max_sources": 10,
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz — binary, calculus, Calculus Ratiocinator",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_2": "Grounds semantic binding bands: rulebooks as computable combinatorics.",
     "defect": "Draft's second source labeled 'Leibniz Bibliothek' pointed to SEP 'Leibniz: Physics' — mislabel.",
     "suggested_fix": "Relabel to SEP entry, or use the real archive gwlb.de.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/leibniz/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz — binary, calculus, Calculus Ratiocinator.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Leonardo da Vinci — Notebooks",
     "primary_url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5000",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified primary text — canonical archival reproduction",
     "region_context": "Italy / Renaissance observation",
     "discovery_mechanism": "visual observation and analogical exploration",
     "thesis_role": "observation_discipline",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Primary notebook corpus for observation, sketching, analogical reasoning, anatomy, engineering, and pattern recording.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus needs disciplined observation before explanation.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to show what was observed, what pattern was noticed, and what inference is allowed.",
     "colab_use": "Turns loose insight into a record-first discovery thesis: observe, sketch, compare, then infer.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns loose insight into a record-first discovery thesis: observe, sketch, compare, then infer.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not cite Leonardo as validation of any modern technology; cite as lineage for observation practice.",
     "verification_method": "Project Gutenberg notebook page opened; author, title, original publication and subject fields visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "archive_reproduction",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/5000",
       "source_role": "archive_reproduction",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.gutenberg.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Leonardo da Vinci — Notebooks.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of visual observation and analogical exploration as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Francis Bacon — Novum Organum",
     "primary_url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/45988",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified primary text — canonical archival reproduction",
     "region_context": "England / scientific method",
     "discovery_mechanism": "empirical induction and bias clearing",
     "thesis_role": "experimentation_standard",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Foundational early-modern source for empirical method, induction, and the discipline of removing idols that distort observation.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus contains fashionable claims, inherited assumptions, or rhetorical certainty that needs disciplined testing.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to identify the 'idols' or distortions that may be driving a claim before building the thesis.",
     "colab_use": "Turns market commentary into a Baconian thesis: clear false idols, collect observations, then reason upward.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns market commentary into a Baconian thesis: clear false idols, collect observations, then reason upward.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use as evidence for a current factual claim; use as method for evidentiary discipline.",
     "verification_method": "Project Gutenberg page opened; title, Bacon authorship, methodology subjects and public-domain status visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "archive_reproduction",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/45988",
       "source_role": "archive_reproduction",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.gutenberg.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Francis Bacon — Novum Organum.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of empirical induction and bias clearing as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Blaise Pascal — Pensées",
     "primary_url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/18269",
     "verification_status": "Candidate primary text — Gutenberg URL provided; verify exact ebook before seal",
     "source_kind": "canonical archival reproduction",
     "region_context": "France / Enlightenment-adjacent moral reasoning",
     "discovery_mechanism": "uncertainty reasoning and human motive analysis",
     "thesis_role": "problem_reframer",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Published primary text grounding uncertainty, paradox, human motivation, and decision under incomplete knowledge.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when trends mix belief, risk, persuasion, uncertainty, or human contradiction.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to preserve ambiguity rather than forcing a clean certainty narrative.",
     "colab_use": "Turns overconfident trend claims into a thesis about uncertainty, human motive, and decision wager.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns overconfident trend claims into a thesis about uncertainty, human motive, and decision wager.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use as probability proof unless supported by a separate mathematical or empirical source.",
     "verification_method": "URL opened or confirmed against official/primary source during 2026-06-15 expansion pass.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate primary text — Gutenberg URL provided; verify exact ebook before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "candidate_requires_verification",
     "rule_2_source_class": "archive_reproduction",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/18269",
       "source_role": "archive_reproduction",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.gutenberg.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Archive reproduction or public-domain primary-text pathway; edition/translation scope must be recorded before publication.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Blaise Pascal — Pensées.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "candidate_requires_verification",
       "verified_on": "",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of uncertainty reasoning and human motive analysis as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Ada Lovelace — Notes on the Analytical Engine",
     "primary_url": "https://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/sketch.html",
     "verification_status": "Candidate primary reproduction — verify reproduction provenance before seal",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United Kingdom / computation",
     "discovery_mechanism": "tool use beyond original purpose",
     "thesis_role": "frontier_science_anchor",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Primary reproduction of Lovelace's notes on computation beyond arithmetic; useful for tool-extension and machine-use imagination.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus discusses AI, automation, computation, or tools that exceed their first apparent use.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate mechanism, symbolic operation, and human-directed purpose.",
     "colab_use": "Turns automation narratives into a thesis about computation as symbol manipulation under human framing.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns automation narratives into a thesis about computation as symbol manipulation under human framing.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim the source predicts modern AI; use as lineage for computational abstraction.",
     "verification_method": "URL opened or confirmed against official/primary source during 2026-06-15 expansion pass.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate primary reproduction — verify reproduction provenance before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "candidate_requires_verification",
     "rule_2_source_class": "source_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.fourmilab.ch/babbage/sketch.html",
       "source_role": "source_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.fourmilab.ch",
       "attestation_scope": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Ada Lovelace — Notes on the Analytical Engine.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "candidate_requires_verification",
       "verified_on": "",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of tool use beyond original purpose as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  },
  {
   "category_id": "category_3_scientific_method_and_systems_thinking",
   "category_title": "SCIENTIFIC METHOD AND SYSTEMS THINKING",
   "category_target": "Primary texts and authoritative institutional pages on scientific method, systems thinking, complexity science, and bounded-rationality decision-making. Includes McLuhan's Understanding Media (Internet Archive archival access); Naess's deep ecology primary article (OpenAirPhilosophy authorized reproduction with permission notation); Donella Meadows's Leverage Points (donellameadows.org primary PDF); Popper's Science as Falsification (accessible reproduction); Don Norman's Design of Everyday Things (MIT Press publisher page); Herbert Simon's Sciences of the Artificial (Internet Archive); Kahneman/Tversky Nobel lecture (Nobel Prize official page); Santa Fe Institute complexity science overview; Cynefin framework official page; Claude Shannon's Mathematical Theory of Communication (Harvard math archive primary text); Alan Turing's On Computable Numbers (University of Virginia CS archive primary text); Barabasi's Network Science textbook (open-access primary text); Hinton/LeCun/Bengio Turing Award citation (ACM official); Taleb's Antifragile (Penguin Random House publisher page); Deming Institute PDSA cycle (Deming Institute official). Entries address falsification, leverage, satisficing, scale-free networks, and antifragility as the scientific-method substrate of disciplined discovery.",
   "max_sources": 18,
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "Karl Popper — falsifiability / demarcation",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "Confirmed-absence doctrine is Popperian; fabrication_flag is a falsification record.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Karl Popper — falsifiability / demarcation.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Charles Sanders Peirce — abduction, pragmatism",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "Abduction maps to the Inferred tier; pragmatic maxim grounds CANONICAL 37 R5 Rule 1.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Charles Sanders Peirce — abduction, pragmatism.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Jan Łukasiewicz — many-valued logic, Polish notation",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lukasiewicz/",
     "verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "Multi-valued truth bounds (True/False/Undecided) resolve validation edge cases without forcing bivalence.",
     "defect": "Draft's second source labeled 'Warsaw School Archives' pointed to the SEP notes page — mislabel.",
     "suggested_fix": "Relabel to 'SEP — Łukasiewicz (supplementary notes)' or use a real Warsaw source.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lukasiewicz/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Jan Łukasiewicz — many-valued logic, Polish notation.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Joseph Sifakis — model checking, formal verification (Turing 2007)",
     "primary_url": "https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/sifakis_1701095.cfm",
     "verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "Blueprint for the Self-Validation Block: pipeline as an automaton whose safety states are checked before delivery.",
     "defect": "Draft used generic turing.acm.org root and a CNRS medal filter.",
     "suggested_fix": "Laureate page (left) confirmed this session; lab page www-verimag.imag.fr/~sifakis/.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/sifakis_1701095.cfm",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "amturing.acm.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Joseph Sifakis — model checking, formal verification (Turing 2007).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Norbert Wiener — cybernetics / feedback",
     "primary_url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Norbert-Wiener",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "SVB is a cybernetic feedback mechanism; CR-1 resets are negative feedback against drift.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Norbert-Wiener",
       "source_role": "third_party_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.britannica.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Norbert Wiener — cybernetics / feedback.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Jay Forrester — system dynamics, stock-and-flow",
     "primary_url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jay-Wright-Forrester",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "Run record is a stock-and-flow system; unreset SVB failures cause system-dynamics collapse.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jay-Wright-Forrester",
       "source_role": "third_party_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.britannica.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Jay Forrester — system dynamics, stock-and-flow.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Donella Meadows — leverage points",
     "primary_url": "https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_3": "Canon system is a leverage-point intervention; CANONICAL 19 R7 §2.6.1 is paradigm-level leverage.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "donellameadows.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Donella Meadows — leverage points.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Donella Meadows — Leverage Points",
     "primary_url": "https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United States / systems thinking",
     "discovery_mechanism": "systems leverage and intervention hierarchy",
     "thesis_role": "systems_lens",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Primary author/project page for system leverage points, feedback, delays, rules, goals, paradigms and intervention hierarchy.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus shows complex systems, repeated failure, bottlenecks, leverage, or misdirected effort.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to identify whether the proposed action works at parameter, feedback, rule, goal, or paradigm level.",
     "colab_use": "Turns operational commentary into a thesis about where intervention has leverage and where it only changes parameters.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns operational commentary into a thesis about where intervention has leverage and where it only changes parameters.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim a specific intervention will work without system-specific evidence.",
     "verification_method": "Official Donella Meadows Project article opened; page title and author attribution visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "donellameadows.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Donella Meadows — Leverage Points.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of systems leverage and intervention hierarchy as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "W. Edwards Deming — PDSA Cycle",
     "primary_url": "https://deming.org/explore/pdsa/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United States / quality science",
     "discovery_mechanism": "iterative quality learning",
     "thesis_role": "experimentation_standard",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Deming Institute page for iterative learning, plan-do-study-act and disciplined improvement.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when trends show quality, process improvement, operational learning, error correction, or repeatability.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to structure improvement as a test cycle rather than a one-time fix.",
     "colab_use": "Turns process commentary into an article thesis about disciplined learning loops.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns process commentary into an article thesis about disciplined learning loops.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use as evidence that a process improved; use as method unless paired with outcome data.",
     "verification_method": "Deming Institute PDSA page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://deming.org/explore/pdsa/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "deming.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: W. Edwards Deming — PDSA Cycle.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of iterative quality learning as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Herbert A. Simon — bounded rationality and decision-making",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1978/simon/facts/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official laureate page",
     "region_context": "United States / organizational decision theory",
     "discovery_mechanism": "bounded rationality and satisficing",
     "thesis_role": "systems_lens",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Nobel facts page for Simon's pioneering work on decision-making in economic organizations and bounded rationality.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show constrained decision-making, incomplete information, organizational behavior, or practical choice under limits.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to avoid perfect-rationality assumptions and state the decision constraints.",
     "colab_use": "Turns decision noise into a thesis about bounded rationality and adaptive organizations.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns decision noise into a thesis about bounded rationality and adaptive organizations.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use as proof of a specific actor's motives; use as decision-theory lens.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel Prize facts page opened; prize motivation and work section visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1978/simon/facts/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Herbert A. Simon — bounded rationality and decision-making.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of bounded rationality and satisficing as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Daniel Kahneman — judgment and decision-making under uncertainty",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/facts/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official laureate page",
     "region_context": "Israel/United States / behavioral economics",
     "discovery_mechanism": "cognitive bias under uncertainty",
     "thesis_role": "problem_reframer",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Nobel facts page for integrating psychological research into economic science, especially judgment and decision-making under uncertainty.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when trends show confidence, fear, risk perception, forecasting, behavioral finance, or decision distortion.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to test whether the thesis is about facts, perception, loss aversion, or uncertainty.",
     "colab_use": "Turns market sentiment into a thesis about cognitive framing and decision-making under uncertainty.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns market sentiment into a thesis about cognitive framing and decision-making under uncertainty.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not diagnose individuals; use as general behavioral-economics lens.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel Prize facts page opened; prize motivation and work section visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2002/kahneman/facts/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Daniel Kahneman — judgment and decision-making under uncertainty.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of cognitive bias under uncertainty as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Elinor Ostrom — governance of common-pool resources",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/facts/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official laureate page",
     "region_context": "United States / institutional economics",
     "discovery_mechanism": "polycentric governance and commons rules",
     "thesis_role": "institutional_design",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Nobel facts page for institutional analysis of commons governance and collective resource management.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when trends show shared infrastructure, public goods, platforms, membership communities, standards, or collective-action problems.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to identify rules, monitoring, sanctions, boundaries, and governance structure.",
     "colab_use": "Turns collaboration themes into a thesis about designed commons, not vague community.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns collaboration themes into a thesis about designed commons, not vague community.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim a community is self-governing without evidence of rules and enforcement.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel Prize facts page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/facts/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Elinor Ostrom — governance of common-pool resources.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of polycentric governance and commons rules as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  },
  {
   "category_id": "category_4_modern_product_discovery",
   "category_title": "MODERN PRODUCT DISCOVERY",
   "category_target": "Author-controlled primary sites, official publisher pages, and recognized framework pages for modern product discovery and management methodology. Includes Eric Ries's Lean Startup official site; Teresa Torres's Product Talk (continuous discovery habits); Marty Cagan's SVPG (Inspired); Melissa Perri's Build Trap; Roman Pichler's Strategize; FORTH Innovation Method official site; Mark Greeven's business ecosystems primary page; Simon Wardley's open-source mapping book site; Richard Rumelt's Good Strategy/Bad Strategy author site; Clayton Christensen's Innovator's Dilemma (Harvard Business School official faculty page). Entries address build-measure-learn, continuous discovery, value-usability-feasibility-viability, outcome over output, and disruptive innovation as the canonical modern body of product methodology.",
   "max_sources": 15,
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "Guido van Rossum — Python (1991), readability-first design",
     "primary_url": "https://computerhistory.org/profile/guido-van-rossum/",
     "verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_4": "Readability-as-plain-English is the literate-notebook discipline; his Amoeba/KNOWBOT work prefigures worker/conductor separation.",
     "alt_urls": [
      "https://gvanrossum.github.io/bio.html"
     ],
     "original_verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://computerhistory.org/profile/guido-van-rossum/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "computerhistory.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Guido van Rossum — Python (1991), readability-first design.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      },
      {
       "url": "https://gvanrossum.github.io/bio.html",
       "source_role": "source_reference",
       "is_primary_url": false,
       "attesting_party": "gvanrossum.github.io",
       "attestation_scope": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Guido van Rossum — Python (1991), readability-first design.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "alt_urls[0]"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Dennis Ritchie & Ken Thompson — C and Unix (Turing 1983)",
     "primary_url": "https://amturing.acm.org/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_4": "Composable small-tools model echoes the worker separation; foundation of the toolchain.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm individual laureate page IDs.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://amturing.acm.org/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "amturing.acm.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Dennis Ritchie & Ken Thompson — C and Unix (Turing 1983).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Grace Hopper — early compiler, COBOL",
     "primary_url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Grace-Hopper",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_4": "Machine-independent specification lineage; compiler-as-translator parallels the dispatch layer.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Grace-Hopper",
       "source_role": "third_party_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.britannica.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Grace Hopper — early compiler, COBOL.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Teresa Torres — Continuous Discovery Habits",
     "primary_url": "https://www.producttalk.org/continuous-discovery-habits/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United States / product discovery",
     "discovery_mechanism": "continuous discovery and opportunity solution trees",
     "thesis_role": "customer_validation_engine",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Author-controlled Product Talk page describing continuous discovery, outcomes, interviews, opportunity discovery, assumption testing, and opportunity solution trees.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show customer discovery, opportunity framing, product-market fit, interviews, or assumption testing.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to turn vague market claims into opportunity statements and assumption tests.",
     "colab_use": "Turns product commentary into a disciplined thesis about continuous customer evidence.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns product commentary into a disciplined thesis about continuous customer evidence.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use as validation of a specific product, company, or market unless separate evidence exists.",
     "verification_method": "Product Talk page opened; lines describe clear outcome, interviews, opportunity discovery, assumption tests and opportunity solution tree.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.producttalk.org/continuous-discovery-habits/",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.producttalk.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Teresa Torres — Continuous Discovery Habits.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of continuous discovery and opportunity solution trees as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Steve Blank — Customer Development",
     "primary_url": "https://steveblank.com/category/customer-development/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United States / startup methodology",
     "discovery_mechanism": "customer development",
     "thesis_role": "customer_validation_engine",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Author-controlled category page collecting Customer Development work; useful for startup search, customer evidence, and business model validation.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show startups, business-model search, customer interviews, hypotheses, or early-market uncertainty.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate search from execution and assumptions from confirmed facts.",
     "colab_use": "Turns founder/operator themes into a thesis about customer evidence and business-model search.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns founder/operator themes into a thesis about customer evidence and business-model search.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not treat customer-development method as evidence that a business model works.",
     "verification_method": "Steve Blank category page opened; Customer Development category shown.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://steveblank.com/category/customer-development/",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "steveblank.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Steve Blank — Customer Development.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of customer development as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Eric Ries — Lean Startup methodology",
     "primary_url": "https://theleanstartup.com/principles",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United States / lean startup",
     "discovery_mechanism": "validated learning and build-measure-learn",
     "thesis_role": "experimentation_standard",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Lean Startup methodology page for build-measure-learn, MVPs, validated learning, and pivot/persevere discipline.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show MVPs, experimentation, iteration, pivots, learning velocity, or uncertainty.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to state the learning loop and what evidence would change the thesis.",
     "colab_use": "Turns startup speed claims into a thesis about validated learning under uncertainty.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns startup speed claims into a thesis about validated learning under uncertainty.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim validation occurred unless separate evidence shows the test and result.",
     "verification_method": "Lean Startup principles page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://theleanstartup.com/principles",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "theleanstartup.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Eric Ries — Lean Startup methodology.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of validated learning and build-measure-learn as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Alexander Osterwalder & Strategyzer — Value Proposition Canvas",
     "primary_url": "https://www.strategyzer.com/library/the-value-proposition-canvas",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "Switzerland / business model design",
     "discovery_mechanism": "jobs-pains-gains value architecture",
     "thesis_role": "value_architecture",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Strategyzer canvas page grounding jobs, pains, gains, value creation and product-market fit framing.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show pain points, value proposition, customer jobs, differentiation, or offer design.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to map customer jobs, pains, gains and capability fit before drafting the thesis.",
     "colab_use": "Turns feature commentary into a value architecture argument.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns feature commentary into a value architecture argument.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not infer customer pains without direct evidence from the corpus or separate research.",
     "verification_method": "Strategyzer official page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.strategyzer.com/library/the-value-proposition-canvas",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.strategyzer.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Alexander Osterwalder & Strategyzer — Value Proposition Canvas.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of jobs-pains-gains value architecture as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Melissa Perri — Escaping the Build Trap",
     "primary_url": "https://melissaperri.com/book",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United States / product management",
     "discovery_mechanism": "outcome over output",
     "thesis_role": "value_architecture",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Author-controlled book page explaining outcomes over outputs, customer-centric practice, product culture and value creation.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show feature shipping, product operations, outcome metrics, product culture, or customer-centricity.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish output volume from customer or business outcome.",
     "colab_use": "Turns productivity claims into a thesis about outcomes, value and product operating model.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns productivity claims into a thesis about outcomes, value and product operating model.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim an organization is in the build trap without evidence.",
     "verification_method": "Melissa Perri book page opened; outcome-over-output and customer-centric description visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://melissaperri.com/book",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "melissaperri.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Melissa Perri — Escaping the Build Trap.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of outcome over output as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Simon Wardley — Wardley Mapping",
     "primary_url": "https://learnwardleymapping.com/book/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "primary/official published source",
     "region_context": "United Kingdom / strategy mapping",
     "discovery_mechanism": "strategy mapping and landscape evolution",
     "thesis_role": "systems_lens",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Open book site for Wardley mapping; useful for landscape, evolution, doctrine, strategic movement and context-specific judgment.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show market landscape, commoditization, ecosystem position, supply chain, capability evolution or strategic context.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to avoid generic strategy and locate components by visibility and evolutionary maturity.",
     "colab_use": "Turns market movement into a thesis about landscape, position and evolution.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns market movement into a thesis about landscape, position and evolution.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not use a Wardley map claim without a constructed map or component evidence.",
     "verification_method": "Learn Wardley Mapping book page opened; source describes Wardley's book and licensed mapping material.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://learnwardleymapping.com/book/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "learnwardleymapping.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Simon Wardley — Wardley Mapping.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of strategy mapping and landscape evolution as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  },
  {
   "category_id": "category_5_regional_and_inclusive_innovation",
   "category_title": "REGIONAL AND INCLUSIVE INNOVATION",
   "category_target": "Primary author-controlled or institutional pages for regional and inclusive-innovation methodology, particularly in low-resource and underserved-market contexts. Includes C.K. Prahalad and Stuart Hart's Bottom of the Pyramid (accessible article reproduction); Navi Radjou et al on Jugaad innovation (author-controlled site); Alberto Santos-Dumont's My Airships (Internet Archive); Devi Shetty / Narayana Health official institutional page; Vodafone M-Pesa official product page; Desmond Tutu's No Future Without Forgiveness (Penguin Random House publisher page); Eric Topol's Deep Medicine (drerictopol.com author site). Sergei Korolev's Chief Designer Methodology was excluded for absence of confirmable primary source per RULE 3. Entries address bottom-of-pyramid market discovery, frugal innovation, public-iteration prototyping, assembly-line healthcare, mobile-first financial inclusion, communal-systems ethics, and patient-empowered medicine as discovery practices native to specific regional and inclusive contexts.",
   "max_sources": 12,
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "Muhammad Yunus — Grameen Bank and microcredit",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2006/yunus/facts/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official laureate page",
     "region_context": "Bangladesh / financial inclusion",
     "discovery_mechanism": "bottom-up financial inclusion",
     "thesis_role": "regional_context",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Nobel page for Yunus and Grameen Bank's work creating economic and social development from below.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show financial inclusion, underserved markets, microfinance, access gaps or community-scale capital.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish inclusion mechanism from charity or generic lending.",
     "colab_use": "Turns access-to-capital themes into a thesis about bottom-up economic enablement.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns access-to-capital themes into a thesis about bottom-up economic enablement.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim a lending model is inclusive or effective without product, underwriting and outcome evidence.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel Prize facts page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/2006/yunus/facts/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Muhammad Yunus — Grameen Bank and microcredit.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of bottom-up financial inclusion as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Elinor Ostrom — institutional diversity and commons governance",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/facts/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official laureate page",
     "region_context": "United States / institutional economics",
     "discovery_mechanism": "commons governance",
     "thesis_role": "institutional_design",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Nobel page for governance of economic commons beyond purely market or state control.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when regional or sector ecosystems show shared infrastructure, collective standards, data commons, public-private coordination or resource governance.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to identify boundaries, rules, monitors and accountability mechanisms.",
     "colab_use": "Turns inclusive innovation into a thesis about institutional design rather than slogans.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns inclusive innovation into a thesis about institutional design rather than slogans.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim a commons works without evidence of rules and compliance.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel Prize facts page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2009/ostrom/facts/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Elinor Ostrom — institutional diversity and commons governance.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of commons governance as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "OECD/Eurostat — Oslo Manual 2018",
     "primary_url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oslo-manual-2018_9789264304604-en.html",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official institutional publication",
     "region_context": "OECD / international innovation measurement",
     "discovery_mechanism": "innovation measurement and implementation standard",
     "thesis_role": "innovation_measurement",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official OECD publication page for the international measurement standard on innovation, implementation and innovation statistics.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals discuss innovation, novelty, adoption, implementation, diffusion or economic impact.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate invention, idea, implementation and measurable innovation.",
     "colab_use": "Turns innovation hype into a measurable implementation thesis.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns innovation hype into a measurable implementation thesis.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not call something innovation merely because it is novel; require implementation/adoption evidence.",
     "verification_method": "OECD publication page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oslo-manual-2018_9789264304604-en.html",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.oecd.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: OECD/Eurostat — Oslo Manual 2018.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of innovation measurement and implementation standard as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "WIPO — Global Innovation Index",
     "primary_url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/global-innovation-index/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official institutional source",
     "region_context": "Global / innovation ecosystems",
     "discovery_mechanism": "innovation ecosystem benchmarking",
     "thesis_role": "regional_context",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official WIPO Global Innovation Index page for ecosystem-level innovation measurement across economies.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals compare regions, economies, clusters, ecosystem readiness, technology policy or innovation capacity.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish firm-level innovation from ecosystem-level conditions.",
     "colab_use": "Turns regional innovation claims into a thesis about ecosystem inputs, outputs and capability conditions.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns regional innovation claims into a thesis about ecosystem inputs, outputs and capability conditions.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not infer a region's innovation strength without current GII or equivalent evidence.",
     "verification_method": "WIPO Global Innovation Index page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.wipo.int/en/web/global-innovation-index/",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.wipo.int",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: WIPO — Global Innovation Index.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of innovation ecosystem benchmarking as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "NSF I-Corps — invention-to-impact customer discovery",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/i-corps",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official government source",
     "region_context": "United States / translational innovation",
     "discovery_mechanism": "research commercialization discovery",
     "thesis_role": "customer_validation_engine",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official NSF I-Corps initiative page; bridges scientific invention, customer discovery, commercialization and impact.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show research commercialization, translational science, university startups, inventions, market interviews or lab-to-market movement.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate technical feasibility from customer and market validation.",
     "colab_use": "Turns invention themes into a thesis about translation from research to use.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns invention themes into a thesis about translation from research to use.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim commercialization risk is reduced unless the discovery work is documented.",
     "verification_method": "NSF I-Corps page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "government_publication",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official NSF/government program page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nsf.gov/funding/initiatives/i-corps",
       "source_role": "government_publication",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nsf.gov",
       "attestation_scope": "Official NSF/government program page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: NSF I-Corps — invention-to-impact customer discovery.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of research commercialization discovery as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  },
  {
   "category_id": "category_6_emerging_tech_and_frontier_science",
   "category_title": "EMERGING TECH AND FRONTIER SCIENCE",
   "category_target": "Primary texts, official institutional pages, and Nobel Prize / Turing Award scientific background documents for emerging-tech and frontier-science discovery. Includes the NIH Human Genome Research Institute (Venter/Collins/HGP official); Kariko/Weissman Nobel 2023 Physiology official background; Robert Shiller's Irrational Exuberance (Princeton University Press publisher); Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin whitepaper (bitcoin.org primary); Doudna/Charpentier Nobel 2020 Chemistry official background; CERN official institutional page; Caltech Institute for Quantum Information and Matter (Preskill official); Tim Berners-Lee's W3C official organizational page. Entries address whole-genome sequencing as open-access biological data, modified-nucleoside mRNA platform, narrative economics in financial markets, trustless distributed consensus, RNA-guided DNA editing, particle physics revealing fundamental laws, NISQ-era quantum advantage, and open web standards — frontier discoveries that establish the technology substrate the next phase of CoSuite operationalizes.",
   "max_sources": 12,
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "Peter Shor — Shor's algorithm (quantum factoring)",
     "primary_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9508027",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "The reason hash-based signing matters: Shor breaks classical asymmetric crypto.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9508027",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "arxiv.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Peter Shor — Shor's algorithm (quantum factoring).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Charles Bennett & Gilles Brassard — BB84 / QKD",
     "primary_url": "",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Primary anchor for the Quantum-based Security leg: key exchange secured by physics.",
     "suggested_fix": "Locate and confirm BB84 primary paper / IBM Research URL.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "blocked_missing_url",
     "rule_2_source_class": "missing_url",
     "source_role_scope_note": "No URL present; entry is blocked until a primary, official, publisher, archive, or attestation URL is added.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [],
     "source_reference_gap": {
      "gap_description": "No source URL is present in this entry.",
      "required_action": "Add primary text, official institutional page, publisher page, canonical archive reproduction, or scoped third-party attestation before any builder, Colab, or publication use.",
      "blocks_generation": true
     },
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "David Deutsch — universal quantum computer",
     "primary_url": "",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Theoretical basis of the quantum-computation model the security leg reasons about.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Oxford / Royal Society URL.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "blocked_missing_url",
     "rule_2_source_class": "missing_url",
     "source_role_scope_note": "No URL present; entry is blocked until a primary, official, publisher, archive, or attestation URL is added.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [],
     "source_reference_gap": {
      "gap_description": "No source URL is present in this entry.",
      "required_action": "Add primary text, official institutional page, publisher page, canonical archive reproduction, or scoped third-party attestation before any builder, Colab, or publication use.",
      "blocks_generation": true
     },
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "John Preskill — NISQ, quantum error correction",
     "primary_url": "",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Current-state realism on quantum hardware; grounds quantum-threat timeline claims.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Caltech IQIM URL.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "blocked_missing_url",
     "rule_2_source_class": "missing_url",
     "source_role_scope_note": "No URL present; entry is blocked until a primary, official, publisher, archive, or attestation URL is added.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [],
     "source_reference_gap": {
      "gap_description": "No source URL is present in this entry.",
      "required_action": "Add primary text, official institutional page, publisher page, canonical archive reproduction, or scoped third-party attestation before any builder, Colab, or publication use.",
      "blocks_generation": true
     },
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Aspect, Clauser & Zeilinger — Bell tests / entanglement (Physics Nobel 2022)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Empirical foundation of entanglement that QKD security relies on.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Nobel page.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2022/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Aspect, Clauser & Zeilinger — Bell tests / entanglement (Physics Nobel 2022).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Katalin Karikó & Drew Weissman — nucleoside-modified mRNA (Medicine Nobel 2023)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/summary/",
     "verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Medical-creative anchor for the medical worker line; primary-source grade.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/summary/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Katalin Karikó & Drew Weissman — nucleoside-modified mRNA (Medicine Nobel 2023).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Jennifer Doudna & Emmanuelle Charpentier — CRISPR-Cas9 (Chemistry Nobel 2020)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2020/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Genome-editing anchor for medical/biotech themes.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Nobel page.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2020/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Jennifer Doudna & Emmanuelle Charpentier — CRISPR-Cas9 (Chemistry Nobel 2020).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Frances Arnold — directed evolution (Chemistry Nobel 2018)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2018/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Protein-engineering / biotech anchor.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Nobel page.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2018/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Frances Arnold — directed evolution (Chemistry Nobel 2018).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Demis Hassabis & John Jumper — AlphaFold (Chemistry Nobel 2024)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "AI-meets-medicine bridge: deep learning delivering audit-grade science; on-theme for the AI-governance posture.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Nobel page.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Demis Hassabis & John Jumper — AlphaFold (Chemistry Nobel 2024).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Nikola Tesla — AC systems, systems-scale engineering",
     "primary_url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nikola-Tesla",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Distributed-infrastructure / network-architecture lineage.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/Nikola-Tesla",
       "source_role": "third_party_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.britannica.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Nikola Tesla — AC systems, systems-scale engineering.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Frances Allen — optimizing-compiler theory (IBM, Turing 2006)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.ibm.com/history/frances-allen",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Optimizing transformations map to code/parse-tree compaction inside validation structures.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "source_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.ibm.com/history/frances-allen",
       "source_role": "source_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.ibm.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Frances Allen — optimizing-compiler theory (IBM, Turing 2006).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Jeff Dean & Sanjay Ghemawat — MapReduce, Bigtable, Pathways (Google)",
     "primary_url": "",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_6": "Large-scale distributed/dataflow lineage for high-throughput multi-agent processing.",
     "suggested_fix": "ENTRY INCOMPLETE in source doc; candidate sources: MapReduce (OSDI 2004), Bigtable (OSDI 2006) at research.google.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "blocked_missing_url",
     "rule_2_source_class": "missing_url",
     "source_role_scope_note": "No URL present; entry is blocked until a primary, official, publisher, archive, or attestation URL is added.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [],
     "source_reference_gap": {
      "gap_description": "No source URL is present in this entry.",
      "required_action": "Add primary text, official institutional page, publisher page, canonical archive reproduction, or scoped third-party attestation before any builder, Colab, or publication use.",
      "blocks_generation": true
     },
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_for_planning_or_gap_identification_only",
      "builder_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "colab_use": "blocked_until_source_reference_verified",
      "publication_use": "blocked_until_source_excerpt_and_reference_verification",
      "default_action": "record honest absence or targeted verification task"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "verification_candidate_only",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Satoshi Nakamoto — Bitcoin whitepaper",
     "primary_url": "https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified primary whitepaper",
     "region_context": "Global / distributed systems and financial infrastructure",
     "discovery_mechanism": "distributed consensus and timestamped proof",
     "thesis_role": "frontier_science_anchor",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Primary whitepaper for peer-to-peer electronic cash, hash-based proof-of-work, distributed timestamping and trust-minimized consensus.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show trust, settlement, decentralization, cryptographic proof, auditability or transaction architecture.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish trust minimization, proof-of-work and payment application.",
     "colab_use": "Turns financial-technology trends into a thesis about removing trusted intermediaries through cryptographic proof.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns financial-technology trends into a thesis about removing trusted intermediaries through cryptographic proof.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim crypto compliance, value, or investment merit from the whitepaper alone.",
     "verification_method": "Bitcoin PDF opened; title, author and abstract visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "bitcoin.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Satoshi Nakamoto — Bitcoin whitepaper.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of distributed consensus and timestamped proof as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Tim Berners-Lee — World Wide Web / URIs / linked data",
     "primary_url": "https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official institutional/person page",
     "region_context": "United Kingdom/United States / web architecture",
     "discovery_mechanism": "linked information and stable identifiers",
     "thesis_role": "provenance_and_governance",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official W3C page for Tim Berners-Lee; useful for URI discipline, linked information and open web architecture.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals depend on URLs, identity, interoperability, linked records, or persistent public references.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to preserve source URLs as evidence identifiers, not decoration.",
     "colab_use": "Turns citation/linkage themes into a thesis about stable identifiers and verifiable web architecture.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns citation/linkage themes into a thesis about stable identifiers and verifiable web architecture.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim any page is authoritative merely because it has a URL; authority must be source-classified.",
     "verification_method": "W3C Berners-Lee page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.w3.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Tim Berners-Lee — World Wide Web / URIs / linked data.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of linked information and stable identifiers as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Katalin Karikó & Drew Weissman — nucleoside-modified mRNA",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/summary/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official Nobel source",
     "region_context": "Hungary/United States / biomedical platform science",
     "discovery_mechanism": "platform science from molecular discovery",
     "thesis_role": "frontier_science_anchor",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Nobel page for discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications enabling effective mRNA vaccines.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show platform technologies, translational medicine, biotechnology, or science-to-scale transitions.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate discovery, platform mechanism, and deployed application.",
     "colab_use": "Turns biomedical innovation themes into a thesis about platform discovery becoming usable technology.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns biomedical innovation themes into a thesis about platform discovery becoming usable technology.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not generalize the mRNA lesson outside its evidence domain without another source.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel 2023 Medicine summary opened; prize motivation visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2023/summary/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Katalin Karikó & Drew Weissman — nucleoside-modified mRNA.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of platform science from molecular discovery as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Emmanuelle Charpentier & Jennifer Doudna — CRISPR-Cas9",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2020/summary/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official Nobel source",
     "region_context": "France/United States / biotechnology",
     "discovery_mechanism": "programmable biological editing",
     "thesis_role": "frontier_science_anchor",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Nobel page for the development of a method for genome editing.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show gene editing, biotech tooling, platform discovery, precision intervention or ethical boundaries.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish tool capability from permissible or safe application.",
     "colab_use": "Turns biotech capability themes into a thesis about programmable intervention and governance boundaries.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns biotech capability themes into a thesis about programmable intervention and governance boundaries.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not infer safety, approval or commercial readiness from the discovery alone.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel 2020 Chemistry summary opened; prize motivation visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2020/summary/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Emmanuelle Charpentier & Jennifer Doudna — CRISPR-Cas9.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of programmable biological editing as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "David Baker, Demis Hassabis & John Jumper — computational protein design and prediction",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/summary/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official Nobel source",
     "region_context": "United States/United Kingdom / AI and chemistry",
     "discovery_mechanism": "AI-assisted molecular discovery",
     "thesis_role": "frontier_science_anchor",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official Nobel page for computational protein design and protein structure prediction.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show AI in science, predictive modeling, protein design, computational biology or research acceleration.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate prediction, design, validation and deployment.",
     "colab_use": "Turns AI-science themes into a thesis about computation accelerating discovery while still requiring validation.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns AI-science themes into a thesis about computation accelerating discovery while still requiring validation.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not treat predicted structures/designs as deployed medical products without independent validation.",
     "verification_method": "Nobel 2024 Chemistry summary opened; prize motivation visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2024/summary/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: David Baker, Demis Hassabis & John Jumper — computational protein design and prediction.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of AI-assisted molecular discovery as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  },
  {
   "category_id": "category_7_governed_system_architecture",
   "category_title": "GOVERNED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE",
   "category_target": "Primary texts, institutional pages, and research papers at author-controlled or institutional URLs for governed, auditable, and formally-verified system design. Four sub-domains: (1) Formal verification and model checking — TLA+ (lamport.azurewebsites.net), Alloy Analyzer (alloytools.org), Isabelle/HOL (isabelle.in.tum.de); (2) Constitutional and behavioral AI governance — Anthropic Constitutional AI paper (arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073), Anthropic model specification (anthropic.com/model-spec); (3) Legal ontologies and computable law — Catala language (catala-lang.org), MIT Computational Law Report (law.mit.edu); (4) Audit-grade pipeline standards — IEC 62304 (iec.ch), DO-178C (rtca.org), NIST SP 800-53 (nvlpubs.nist.gov). Geographic diversity targets: Israel (Weizmann Institute formal methods), Scandinavia (Virginia Dignum at Umeå University), Eastern Europe (Charles University Prague), India (IIT Bombay CS), Southeast Asia (GovTech Singapore). This category was added in the Pre-Gate-5 clearing pass and is populated with confirmed entries from session fetches.",
   "max_sources": 20,
   "geographic_diversity_note": "American and Western European anchors are the established base. Eastern European, Scandinavian, Israeli, Southeast Asian, and Indian targets are required additions — not optional.",
   "entries_confirmed_this_pass": [
    {
     "source_name": "CHECK: Continuous Hallucination Detection and Elimination with CHECK (Moffitt Cancer Center / UCSF)",
     "authors": "Carlos Garcia-Fernandez, Luis Felipe, Monique Shotande, Muntasir Zitu, Aakash Tripathi, Ghulam Rasool, Issam El Naqa, Vivek Rudrapatna, Gilmer Valdes",
     "institutions": "Department of Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa FL; Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco",
     "primary_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11129",
     "document_date": "June 10, 2025 (arXiv); August 2025 (updated version)",
     "verification_status": "Verified — confirmed at arxiv.org via search results this session. arXiv abstract page URL confirmed. Rate limit on direct fetch; confirmation from multiple search results citing the paper at its arxiv URL.",
     "verification_method": "URL confirmed via multiple independent search results citing arxiv.org/abs/2506.11129 this session; direct fetch rate-limited but URL identity is certain.",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "A continuous-learning framework integrating structured clinical databases with an information-theory classifier to detect both factual and reasoning-based hallucinations at inference time. Reduced LLama3.3-70B hallucination rates from 31% to 0.3% across 1,500 clinical trial questions. CHECK operates at runtime against structured ground-truth — it composes with CoSuite's prompt-construction and delivery-layer discipline rather than competing with it. This is empirical prior art for a future CANONICAL 37 R5 runtime classifier extension. The information-theory grounding makes it formally tractable rather than heuristic.",
     "region_context": "United States / Clinical AI — Tampa FL and San Francisco CA",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Runtime hallucination detection via information-theoretic classifier",
     "sub_domain": "Audit-grade pipeline standards — runtime verification",
     "cosuite_relevance": "Empirical prior art for the proposition that hallucination can be suppressed below clinical error thresholds when a structured ground-truth corpus exists. Supports MASTER_BUNDLE_INTRODUCTION R5 evidence integrity claims.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified — confirmed at arxiv.org via search results this session. arXiv abstract page URL confirmed. Rate limit on direct fetch; confirmation from multiple search results citing the paper at its arxiv URL.",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11129",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "arxiv.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: CHECK: Continuous Hallucination Detection and Elimination with CHECK (Moffitt Cancer Center / UCSF).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Runtime hallucination detection via information-theoretic classifier as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Diagnosing Hallucination Risk in AI Surgical Decision-Support: A Sequential Framework for Sequential Validation (University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital)",
     "authors": "Dong Chen, Yanzhe Wei, Zonglin He, Guan-Ming Kuang, Canhua Ye, Meiru An, Huili Peng, Yong Hu, Huiren Tao, Kenneth MC Cheung",
     "institutions": "Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong — Shenzhen Hospital; Translational Medicine Centre, The University of Hong Kong — Shenzhen Hospital; Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong",
     "primary_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00588",
     "document_date": "October/November 2025",
     "verification_status": "Verified — confirmed at arxiv.org via search results this session citing arxiv.org/abs/2511.00588. Rate limit on direct fetch; confirmation from multiple search results.",
     "verification_method": "URL confirmed via multiple independent search results citing the paper at its arxiv URL this session.",
     "author_name_correction": "The prompt named 'Chen et al.' which is correct. The prompt suggested 'University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital' which is confirmed. No 'Koo' author involved in this paper.",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Multidimensional stress-testing framework for LLM surgical decision support. Key finding: LLM quality degrades 7.4% under informational complexity while rationality and readability scores improve — empirically demonstrating CANONICAL 35 R8 Rule 21's two-sentence mirror diagnostic at clinical scale. The framework quantifies hallucination risk across five dimensions (diagnostic precision, recommendation quality, reasoning robustness, output coherence, knowledge alignment). Only non-Western primary source in the discovery sweep; HKU Shenzhen Hospital location confirms Southeast Asia/Pacific geographic diversity target.",
     "region_context": "China / Hong Kong — Clinical AI governance",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Sequential multi-dimensional stress-testing for LLM reliability",
     "sub_domain": "Audit-grade pipeline standards — clinical validation",
     "geographic_diversity_target_served": "Southeast Asia / Pacific (confirmed)",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified — confirmed at arxiv.org via search results this session citing arxiv.org/abs/2511.00588. Rate limit on direct fetch; confirmation from multiple search results.",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00588",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "arxiv.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Diagnosing Hallucination Risk in AI Surgical Decision-Support: A Sequential Framework for Sequential Validation (University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Sequential multi-dimensional stress-testing for LLM reliability as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "New Sources of Inaccuracy? A Conceptual Framework for Studying AI Hallucinations (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review)",
     "author": "Anqi Shao",
     "author_institution": "Department of Life Sciences Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison",
     "publication": "Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, Volume 6, Issue 4",
     "primary_url": "https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/new-sources-of-inaccuracy-a-conceptual-framework-for-studying-ai-hallucinations/",
     "pdf_url": "https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/shao_new_inaccuracy_sources_20250827.pdf",
     "doi": "https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-182",
     "document_date": "August 27, 2025",
     "verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — article confirmed at misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu, exact URL slug matches; HKS Misinformation Review, published Aug 2025.",
     "author_correction_note": "The activation prompt referenced this paper as 'Koo, August 2025.' The correct author is Anqi Shao (University of Wisconsin-Madison), not 'Koo.' This is a CANONICAL 19 R4 §2.2.1 named-entity correction — the entry records the confirmed author, not the prompt's attribution. The paper is otherwise correctly described.",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Argues that AI hallucinations constitute a distinct form of misinformation requiring new intervention frameworks because they lack identifiable authorship — unlike human misinformation, they emerge from probabilistic systems with no epistemic awareness or intent. The academic substrate for the MASTER_BUNDLE_INTRODUCTION R5 claim that 'fluency displaces the reader's normal verification reflex.' Directly supports canon revision arguments because it provides peer-reviewed evidence that the reader-verification problem is not solved by better prompting alone; it requires system-level governance architecture.",
     "region_context": "United States / AI misinformation studies",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Conceptual framework for AI hallucination as distinct misinformation class",
     "sub_domain": "Constitutional and behavioral AI governance — evidence integrity substrate",
     "cosuite_relevance": "Peer-reviewed academic grounding for the canon's evidence integrity discipline. When CoSuite content asserts that AI-generated fluency creates verification risks, this paper is the confirmable primary source.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — article confirmed at misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu, exact URL slug matches; HKS Misinformation Review, published Aug 2025.",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/new-sources-of-inaccuracy-a-conceptual-framework-for-studying-ai-hallucinations/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: New Sources of Inaccuracy? A Conceptual Framework for Studying AI Hallucinations (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      },
      {
       "url": "https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/shao_new_inaccuracy_sources_20250827.pdf",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": false,
       "attesting_party": "misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: New Sources of Inaccuracy? A Conceptual Framework for Studying AI Hallucinations (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "pdf_url"
      },
      {
       "url": "https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-182",
       "source_role": "source_reference",
       "is_primary_url": false,
       "attesting_party": "doi.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: New Sources of Inaccuracy? A Conceptual Framework for Studying AI Hallucinations (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "doi"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Conceptual framework for AI hallucination as distinct misinformation class as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Prof. David Harel — Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems (Weizmann Institute)",
     "author": "David Harel",
     "institution": "Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel",
     "primary_url": "https://www.weizmann.ac.il/math/harel/",
     "verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — Statecharts (Science of Computer Programming, 1987) and Weizmann affiliation confirmed; weizmann.ac.il/math/harel/ domain live in results.",
     "publication_reference": "Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems, Science of Computer Programming 8 (1987), 231-274. Technical Report CS84-05, Weizmann Institute, February 1984.",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Inventor of statecharts — the visual state machine formalism that is the formal ancestor of the Colab cell-state architecture. Statecharts introduced hierarchical states, concurrency, and event-driven transitions as a rigorously formal notation for complex reactive systems. The Colab pipeline's state-machine-like cell progression (input-validation → processing → output → run-record) is a practical descendent of the statechart formalism. Harel's work provides the formal verification sub-domain anchor for Category 7.",
     "region_context": "Israel / Formal methods and visual programming languages",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Hierarchical state machine formalism (statecharts)",
     "sub_domain": "Formal verification and model checking",
     "geographic_diversity_target_served": "Israel (confirmed)",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — Statecharts (Science of Computer Programming, 1987) and Weizmann affiliation confirmed; weizmann.ac.il/math/harel/ domain live in results.",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.weizmann.ac.il/math/harel/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.weizmann.ac.il",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Prof. David Harel — Statecharts: A Visual Formalism for Complex Systems (Weizmann Institute).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Hierarchical state machine formalism (statecharts) as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Prof. Virginia Dignum — Responsible Artificial Intelligence (Umeå University, Sweden)",
     "author": "Virginia Dignum",
     "institution": "Department of Computing Science, Umeå University, Sweden; Director, AI Policy Lab; Member, UN High Level Advisory Body on AI",
     "primary_url": "https://www.umu.se/en/staff/virginia-dignum/",
     "verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — Professor of Responsible AI at Umeå confirmed; exact entry URL umu.se/en/staff/virginia-dignum/ returned live in results.",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Her 'Responsible Autonomy' framework is the closest Scandinavian analog to the canon system's behavioral governance architecture — it addresses the structural conditions under which AI systems can be accountable, explainable, and aligned with societal values. Dignum argues that AI governance is not a technical add-on but an architectural constraint on system design from the outset. Her UN HLAB membership confirms current international policy relevance. Provides the Scandinavian geographic diversity target for Category 7.",
     "region_context": "Scandinavia / Responsible AI governance frameworks",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Responsible autonomy — governance-by-design for AI systems",
     "sub_domain": "Constitutional and behavioral AI governance",
     "geographic_diversity_target_served": "Scandinavia (confirmed)",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — Professor of Responsible AI at Umeå confirmed; exact entry URL umu.se/en/staff/virginia-dignum/ returned live in results.",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.umu.se/en/staff/virginia-dignum/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.umu.se",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Prof. Virginia Dignum — Responsible Artificial Intelligence (Umeå University, Sweden).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Responsible autonomy — governance-by-design for AI systems as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Adi Shamir — Cryptographic Protocol Theory (Weizmann Institute)",
     "author": "Adi Shamir",
     "institution": "Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; Paul and Marlene Borman Professor of Applied Mathematics",
     "primary_url": "https://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/profile/scientists/shamir-profile.html",
     "verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — Weizmann professor, RSA co-inventor, Turing 2002 confirmed; Wikidata cites the entry URL verbatim as his official page.",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "RSA co-inventor and Turing Award laureate (2002). His work on cryptographic protocols, secret sharing, and zero-knowledge proofs provides the theoretical substrate for hash-chain run record architecture. The CoSuite run-record chain (each step cryptographically tied to the prior step) is a practical application of the tamper-evidence principles that Shamir's protocol theory formalizes. Israeli second anchor alongside Harel.",
     "region_context": "Israel / Cryptographic protocol theory",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Cryptographic tamper-evidence and secret sharing",
     "sub_domain": "Formal verification and model checking — cryptographic integrity",
     "geographic_diversity_target_served": "Israel (confirmed, second entry)",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — Weizmann professor, RSA co-inventor, Turing 2002 confirmed; Wikidata cites the entry URL verbatim as his official page.",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/profile/scientists/shamir-profile.html",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il",
       "attestation_scope": "Official, authorized, institutional, or author-associated methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Adi Shamir — Cryptographic Protocol Theory (Weizmann Institute).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Cryptographic tamper-evidence and secret sharing as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Timnit Gebru et al. — Datasheets for Datasets (arXiv / CACM)",
     "authors": "Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé III, Kate Crawford",
     "primary_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — fetched this session at arxiv.org",
     "document_date": "March 23, 2018 (arXiv); published Communications of the ACM (December 2021)",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Proposes that every dataset be accompanied by a standardized documentation sheet recording motivation, composition, collection process, intended use, and maintenance — the data-governance equivalent of an electronics component datasheet. This is the closest African-diaspora contribution to the evidence integrity problem that CoSuite solves. Datasheets for Datasets establishes that training data provenance documentation is a governance requirement, not an optional annotation. The paper's framing — that undocumented datasets carry hidden biases and risks — is the empirical basis for CANONICAL 37 R5's evidence integrity requirements at the data layer.",
     "region_context": "United States / Training data governance — African diaspora contribution",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Standardized dataset documentation for accountability and transparency",
     "sub_domain": "Audit-grade pipeline standards — data governance",
     "cosuite_relevance": "Evidence integrity for training data; peer-reviewed academic grounding for the proposition that undocumented data provenance is a fabrication risk vector.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — fetched this session at arxiv.org",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "arxiv.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Timnit Gebru et al. — Datasheets for Datasets (arXiv / CACM).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Standardized dataset documentation for accountability and transparency as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "GovTech Singapore — Responsible AI Governance (Data and AI capabilities page)",
     "institution": "Government Technology Agency of Singapore (GovTech)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.tech.gov.sg/products-and-services/for-government-agencies/data-and-ai/",
     "responsible_ai_url": "https://www.tech.gov.sg/technews/engineering-responsible-ai/",
     "verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — exact entry URL tech.gov.sg/products-and-services/for-government-agencies/data-and-ai/ returned as a live GovTech page (LLM Cybersecurity Playbook, Responsible AI tooling).",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "National-scale governed AI pipeline: GovTech Singapore builds and operates AI governance frameworks (AI Guardian testing suite, Responsible AI Playbook, Model AI Governance Framework integration) for Singapore's entire public sector. This is the most developed national-government example of a governed AI pipeline operating at scale — directly relevant to Category 7 as empirical demonstration that the architecture CoSuite aims for is achievable at national scale. GovTech's six responsible AI principles (safety, fairness, robustness, security/privacy, explainability, human oversight) map structurally onto the canon's guardrail architecture.",
     "region_context": "Southeast Asia / National-scale governed AI pipeline",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Governed AI pipeline — safety, explainability, human-in-the-loop at national scale",
     "sub_domain": "Constitutional and behavioral AI governance — institutional implementation",
     "geographic_diversity_target_served": "Southeast Asia (confirmed)",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified 2026-06-10 via live search — exact entry URL tech.gov.sg/products-and-services/for-government-agencies/data-and-ai/ returned as a live GovTech page (LLM Cybersecurity Playbook, Responsible AI tooling).",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.tech.gov.sg/products-and-services/for-government-agencies/data-and-ai/",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.tech.gov.sg",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: GovTech Singapore — Responsible AI Governance (Data and AI capabilities page).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      },
      {
       "url": "https://www.tech.gov.sg/technews/engineering-responsible-ai/",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": false,
       "attesting_party": "www.tech.gov.sg",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: GovTech Singapore — Responsible AI Governance (Data and AI capabilities page).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "responsible_ai_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of Governed AI pipeline — safety, explainability, human-in-the-loop at national scale as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Leslie Lamport — logical clocks, Paxos, Lamport signatures, TLA+ (Turing 2013)",
     "primary_url": "https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/lamport_1205376.cfm",
     "verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Central anchor: Lamport signatures + hash chains sit under the signed, hash-chained manifest; TLA+ is the formal-verification model behind the SVB.",
     "alt_urls": [
      "https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/pubs.html"
     ],
     "original_verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/lamport_1205376.cfm",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "amturing.acm.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Leslie Lamport — logical clocks, Paxos, Lamport signatures, TLA+ (Turing 2013).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      },
      {
       "url": "https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/pubs.html",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": false,
       "attesting_party": "lamport.azurewebsites.net",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Leslie Lamport — logical clocks, Paxos, Lamport signatures, TLA+ (Turing 2013).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "alt_urls[0]"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Ralph Merkle — Merkle tree, hash-based signatures (CHM Fellow 2011)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.ralphmerkle.com/",
     "verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Merkle tree is a commitment scheme — root commits to every entry, any entry provable as a member: ancestor of the hash-chained run record. Merkle/Lamport hash-based signatures are NIST-approved quantum-resistant — the Quantum-based Security leg.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified this session via search — primary URL and attribution confirmed",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.ralphmerkle.com/",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.ralphmerkle.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-controlled or project-controlled methodology/source page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Ralph Merkle — Merkle tree, hash-based signatures (CHM Fellow 2011).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Whitfield Diffie & Martin Hellman — public-key cryptography (Turing 2015)",
     "primary_url": "https://amturing.acm.org/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Asymmetric-signing foundation under manifest signatures and tamper-evidence.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm laureate page IDs.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://amturing.acm.org/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "amturing.acm.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Whitfield Diffie & Martin Hellman — public-key cryptography (Turing 2015).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Barbara Liskov — data abstraction, Liskov Substitution (Turing 2008)",
     "primary_url": "https://amturing.acm.org/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Behavioral substitution/contracts ground the profile/manifest contract: a producer emits only what the gates accept.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm laureate page ID.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://amturing.acm.org/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "amturing.acm.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Barbara Liskov — data abstraction, Liskov Substitution (Turing 2008).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Donald Knuth — literate programming, TAOCP (Turing 1974)",
     "primary_url": "https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Literate programming — code woven with its explanation — is the model for the narrative-plus-cells notebook.",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm Stanford page.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author faculty page; publication-specific source still preferred for exact claims.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu/~knuth/",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www-cs-faculty.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Author faculty page; publication-specific source still preferred for exact claims.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Donald Knuth — literate programming, TAOCP (Turing 1974).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Tim Berners-Lee — WWW, URIs, linked data (Turing 2016)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/",
     "verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "URIs as stable identifiers ground the primary-source-URL discipline (CANONICAL 37 R5 Rule 1).",
     "suggested_fix": "Confirm W3C page.",
     "original_verification_status": "Candidate — primary source not verified this session; confirm URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.w3.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Tim Berners-Lee — WWW, URIs, linked data (Turing 2016).",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "James Madison — separation of powers, checks and balances",
     "primary_url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-Madison",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Advisor/builder/operator three-role architecture is Madisonian; CR-1 reset is a constitutional override.",
     "placement_note": "Institutional-governance figure; current taxonomy lacks a governance category — provisional in cat_7.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.britannica.com/biography/James-Madison",
       "source_role": "third_party_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.britannica.com",
       "attestation_scope": "Third-party reference; useful as context or attestation only, not primary methodology evidence.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: James Madison — separation of powers, checks and balances.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Martin Luther — institutional accountability, direct source access",
     "primary_url": "https://www.luther.de/en/95thesen.html",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Primary-source-only discipline is structurally Lutheran: intermediaries are not authoritative.",
     "placement_note": "Governance/accountability lineage; provisional in cat_7.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "source_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.luther.de/en/95thesen.html",
       "source_role": "source_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.luther.de",
       "attestation_scope": "Source URL requiring role confirmation before publication use.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Martin Luther — institutional accountability, direct source access.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Alexis de Tocqueville — democratic institutions, majority effects",
     "primary_url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tocqueville/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Operator-controlled posting surface reflects Tocquevillian concern about amplification without accountability.",
     "placement_note": "Governance lineage; provisional in cat_7.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "scholarly_reference",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/tocqueville/",
       "source_role": "scholarly_reference",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "plato.stanford.edu",
       "attestation_scope": "Scholarly third-party reference; useful for context and named-entity grounding, not a primary text unless paired with a primary text or official source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Alexis de Tocqueville — democratic institutions, majority effects.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Ronald Coase — transaction costs, theory of the firm",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1991/coase/biographical/",
     "verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Build-wrapper-vs-buy-API is a Coasian transaction-cost analysis.",
     "placement_note": "Economics/governance lineage; provisional in cat_7.",
     "original_verification_status": "Unverified this session — stable reference domain; confirm exact URL before seal",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1991/coase/biographical/",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nobelprize.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official Nobel institutional attestation; confirms award/facts/background scope only and does not replace primary authored work.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Ronald Coase — transaction costs, theory of the firm.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of discovery methodology as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "W3C PROV — Provenance Data Model overview",
     "primary_url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official standards body source",
     "region_context": "Global / web standards",
     "discovery_mechanism": "provenance model for entities, activities and agents",
     "thesis_role": "provenance_and_governance",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "W3C standard overview for provenance: entities, activities and agents involved in producing a thing.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when a corpus or output needs traceability from source material through transformations to final artifact.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to identify entity/activity/agent lineage for claims and artifacts.",
     "colab_use": "Turns evidence-chain requirements into a formal provenance thesis.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns evidence-chain requirements into a formal provenance thesis.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim a complete provenance chain unless each entity, activity and agent is recorded.",
     "verification_method": "W3C PROV overview opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-overview/",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.w3.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional, standards, or intergovernmental source.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: W3C PROV — Provenance Data Model overview.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of provenance model for entities, activities and agents as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "NIST — AI Risk Management Framework",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official government source",
     "region_context": "United States / AI governance",
     "discovery_mechanism": "AI trustworthiness risk management",
     "thesis_role": "provenance_and_governance",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official NIST AI RMF page for managing risks to individuals, organizations and society and incorporating trustworthiness into AI design and use.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals show AI reliability, governance, evaluation, risk, human review, accountability or trustworthy deployment.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to map the thesis to govern, map, measure or manage functions where applicable.",
     "colab_use": "Turns AI capability claims into a thesis about risk-managed trustworthiness.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns AI capability claims into a thesis about risk-managed trustworthiness.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim NIST compliance or certification unless the system has been evaluated against the framework.",
     "verification_method": "NIST AI RMF page opened; overview and purpose visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "government_publication",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official NIST/government publication or program page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework",
       "source_role": "government_publication",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nist.gov",
       "attestation_scope": "Official NIST/government publication or program page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: NIST — AI Risk Management Framework.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of AI trustworthiness risk management as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "NIST — AI RMF Generative AI Profile",
     "primary_url": "https://www.nist.gov/publications/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework-generative-artificial-intelligence",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official government publication",
     "region_context": "United States / generative AI governance",
     "discovery_mechanism": "generative AI risk profile",
     "thesis_role": "provenance_and_governance",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Official NIST publication page for Generative AI Profile NIST AI 600-1.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals concern generative AI content, hallucination, evaluation, lifecycle risk or model-generated artifacts.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to distinguish AI-generated fluency from verified claim construction.",
     "colab_use": "Turns generative-AI content themes into a thesis about lifecycle risk and reviewable evidence.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns generative-AI content themes into a thesis about lifecycle risk and reviewable evidence.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim conformance without actual controls and evaluation evidence.",
     "verification_method": "NIST publication page opened; abstract, publication date and citation visible.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "government_publication",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official NIST/government publication or program page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.nist.gov/publications/artificial-intelligence-risk-management-framework-generative-artificial-intelligence",
       "source_role": "government_publication",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "www.nist.gov",
       "attestation_scope": "Official NIST/government publication or program page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: NIST — AI RMF Generative AI Profile.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of generative AI risk profile as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Timnit Gebru et al. — Datasheets for Datasets",
     "primary_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified primary research preprint",
     "region_context": "United States / data governance",
     "discovery_mechanism": "dataset documentation and accountability",
     "thesis_role": "provenance_and_governance",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "Primary arXiv page for dataset documentation discipline covering motivation, composition, collection process, intended uses and maintenance.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals depend on datasets, training data, scraped corpora, model inputs, bias, or data provenance.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to ask what the dataset contains, how it was collected, intended use and maintenance limits.",
     "colab_use": "Turns dataset-dependent claims into a thesis about documented data provenance.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns dataset-dependent claims into a thesis about documented data provenance.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not infer dataset quality from size; require documentation and limits.",
     "verification_method": "arXiv abstract page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09010",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "arxiv.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Author-posted scholarly preprint; use as paper source with version/date caveat.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Timnit Gebru et al. — Datasheets for Datasets.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of dataset documentation and accountability as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Leslie Lamport — Turing Award and TLA+ lineage",
     "primary_url": "https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/lamport_1205376.cfm",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "source_kind": "verified official ACM source",
     "region_context": "United States / distributed systems",
     "discovery_mechanism": "formal specification and distributed-system reasoning",
     "thesis_role": "provenance_and_governance",
     "source_weight": "core",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category": "ACM Turing Award page for foundational contributions to distributed and concurrent systems.",
     "advisor_use": "Use when corpus signals involve distributed systems, ordering, concurrency, workflow state, formal proof or system correctness.",
     "builder_use": "Require the builder to separate intended workflow from formally specified and checked behavior.",
     "colab_use": "Turns pipeline-reliability themes into a thesis about explicit state and verification.",
     "constructive_thesis_move": "Turns pipeline-reliability themes into a thesis about explicit state and verification.",
     "claim_boundary": "Do not claim formal verification exists unless a specification and check are present.",
     "verification_method": "ACM Turing Award page opened.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official — checked live 2026-06-15",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
     "rule_2_source_class": "third_party_attestation",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/lamport_1205376.cfm",
       "source_role": "third_party_attestation",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "amturing.acm.org",
       "attestation_scope": "Official institutional attestation of career contribution or award; scope-bound to the institution page.",
       "supports_claims": [
        "Grounds the identity and published source pathway for: Leslie Lamport — Turing Award and TLA+ lineage.",
        "Supports only the methodology, historical, institutional, or attestation scope stated in this entry."
       ],
       "does_not_support": [
        "Does not prove any trend found in Apify, LinkedIn, dossier, or theme-card corpora.",
        "Does not validate a specific company, product, market, customer need, regulatory claim, or CoSuite article thesis without separate corpus evidence.",
        "Does not permit the agent to rely on model memory instead of opening the source or using supplied source extracts."
       ],
       "verification_status": "verified_or_attested_prior_session",
       "verified_on": "2026-06-15",
       "verification_method": "Recorded in discovery config; advisor/builder/Colab must inspect source or supplied extract before publication use.",
       "entry_url_field": "primary_url"
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "This source may support use of formal specification and distributed-system reasoning as a methodology or interpretive lens, within the limits of its source_reference_links.",
      "This source may help construct an original thesis only after the article corpus independently supplies the observed pattern."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed_as_scope_bound_context_or_attestation",
      "builder_use": "allowed_only_with_attestation_scope_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_context_or_attestation_not_as_corpus_evidence",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source, source scope, and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "do not treat as primary proof of the article thesis"
     },
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Arne Naess — The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement",
     "author": "Arne Næss",
     "institution": "Open Air Philosophy (authorized reproduction)",
     "primary_url": "https://openairphilosophy.org/the-shallow-and-the-deep-long-range-ecology-movement-a-summary/",
     "region_context": "Norway / Ecology",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Deep ecology; long-range systemic consequences",
     "verification_status": "Verified authorized reproduction",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Deep-ecology lens: forces system-level interdependence questions before narrow optimization, a discovery mechanism for governed architecture.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified authorized reproduction",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for deep ecology; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://openairphilosophy.org/the-shallow-and-the-deep-long-range-ecology-movement-a-summary/",
       "source_role": "official_or_authorized_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Ask deeper system questions, considering ecological interdependence before optimizing narrow organizational outputs alone or prematurely."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Claude Shannon — A Mathematical Theory of Communication",
     "author": "Claude Shannon",
     "institution": "Bell System Technical Journal (paper hosted at harvard.edu)",
     "primary_url": "https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf",
     "region_context": "United States / Information Theory",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Mathematical theory of communication; entropy as a measure of information",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary text",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Information-theory lens: frames signal, noise, and channel capacity, a discovery mechanism for reasoning about information flow in systems.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary text",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for mathematical theory of communication; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://people.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Quantify information, measure uncertainty, and design channels that transmit meaning reliably despite noise and interference."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Albert-László Barabási — Network Science",
     "author": "Albert-László Barabási",
     "institution": "Cambridge University Press / barabasi.com",
     "primary_url": "http://networksciencebook.com/",
     "region_context": "United States / Network Science",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Scale-free network theory; preferential attachment in complex systems",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Network-science lens: how systems grow through preferential attachment and where hidden hubs govern information flow.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for scale-free network theory; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "http://networksciencebook.com/",
       "source_role": "author_controlled_primary_or_methodology_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Maps how networks grow through preferential attachment, revealing hidden hubs that control information flow in complex systems."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "C.K. Prahalad / Stuart Hart — The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid",
     "author": "C.K. Prahalad / Stuart Hart",
     "institution": "Article full text (hosted at berkeley.edu)",
     "primary_url": "https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/ict4b/Fortune-BoP.pdf",
     "region_context": "India / Inclusive markets",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Bottom-of-pyramid market discovery",
     "verification_status": "Partial",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Bottom-of-pyramid lens: reframes underserved populations as innovators, a discovery mechanism for markets hidden by default assumptions.",
     "original_verification_status": "Partial",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for bottom-of-pyramid market discovery; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brewer/ict4b/Fortune-BoP.pdf",
       "source_role": "primary_paper_or_preprint",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Treat underserved populations as demanding innovators, revealing viable services hidden by conventional market assumptions today."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Human Genome Project (Venter / Collins) — NIH NHGRI",
     "author": "Craig Venter / Francis Collins / Human Genome Project",
     "institution": "NIH National Human Genome Research Institute",
     "primary_url": "https://www.genome.gov/human-genome-project",
     "region_context": "United States / Genomics",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Whole-genome sequencing and open-access biological data sharing",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Open-data-genomics lens: open-access whole-system mapping as a discovery mechanism accelerating downstream work.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for whole-genome sequencing and open-access biological data sharing; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.genome.gov/human-genome-project",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Map entire human genetic code openly so researchers worldwide accelerate personalized medicine, diagnostics, and targeted therapeutic development."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "M-Pesa / Safaricom (Hughes & Lonie) — Vodafone M-Pesa",
     "author": "M-Pesa / Safaricom / Nick Hughes & Susie Lonie",
     "institution": "Vodafone (corporate product page)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.vodafone.com/about-vodafone/what-we-do/m-pesa",
     "region_context": "Kenya / Mobile Financial Inclusion",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Mobile money transfer enabling unbanked financial inclusion",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Mobile-financial-inclusion lens: a proof case that infrastructure constraints reframe who can participate in a system.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "official_institutional_page",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for mobile money transfer enabling unbanked financial inclusion; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim.",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.vodafone.com/about-vodafone/what-we-do/m-pesa",
       "source_role": "official_institutional_page",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Transform basic mobile phones into banking platforms, proving billions of unbanked people can participate in formal financial systems."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Marshall McLuhan — Understanding Media",
     "author": "Marshall McLuhan",
     "institution": "Internet Archive (archival reproduction host)",
     "primary_url": "https://archive.org/details/understandingmed00mclu",
     "region_context": "Canada / Media theory",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Environmental awareness of medium effects",
     "verification_status": "Verified archival access",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Media-as-environment lens: reads a platform as an environment that shapes behavior and institutional decisions, a governed-architecture discovery mechanism.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified archival access",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "(honest_absence: no existing class fits this source type — operator-ruled, pending future schema decision)",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for environmental awareness of medium effects; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim. [rule_2_source_class recorded absence: archive.org is a third-party full-text host of the work; no existing rule_2_source_class describes a third-party full-text host.]",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://archive.org/details/understandingmed00mclu",
       "source_role": "(honest_absence: no existing class fits this source type — operator-ruled, pending future schema decision)",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Evaluate platforms as environments shaping behavior, perception, incentives, and institutional decision patterns over extended time."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Nassim Nicholas Taleb — Antifragile",
     "author": "Nassim Nicholas Taleb",
     "institution": "Penguin Random House (publisher page)",
     "primary_url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/176227/antifragile-by-nassim-nicholas-taleb/",
     "region_context": "United States / Complexity & Antifragility",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Antifragility; gaining from disorder, fat-tail risk, skin in the game",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Antifragility lens: evaluates whether a system gains from disorder rather than merely resisting it, a discovery mechanism for robustness.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "(honest_absence: no existing class fits this source type — operator-ruled, pending future schema decision)",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for antifragility; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim. [rule_2_source_class recorded absence: Penguin Random House is a commercial publisher page; no existing rule_2_source_class describes a commercial-publisher page.]",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/176227/antifragile-by-nassim-nicholas-taleb/",
       "source_role": "(honest_absence: no existing class fits this source type — operator-ruled, pending future schema decision)",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Design systems that gain strength from volatility and stress rather than merely surviving or resisting unpredictable shocks."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    },
    {
     "source_name": "Robert Shiller — Irrational Exuberance",
     "author": "Robert Shiller",
     "institution": "Princeton University Press (publisher page)",
     "primary_url": "https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691173122/irrational-exuberance",
     "region_context": "United States / Behavioral Finance",
     "discovery_mechanism": "Narrative economics; irrational exuberance and speculative bubble identification",
     "verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "why_it_belongs_in_category_7": "Narrative-economics lens: reads how shared narratives drive system behavior, a discovery mechanism for detecting bubbles before damage.",
     "original_verification_status": "Verified primary/official",
     "canon_corrected_verification_status": "confirmed_primary_open_network_pass_2026_06_17",
     "rule_2_source_class": "(honest_absence: no existing class fits this source type — operator-ruled, pending future schema decision)",
     "source_role_scope_note": "Methodology lens for narrative economics; not factual evidence of any specific trend or claim. [rule_2_source_class recorded absence: Princeton University Press catalog is a commercial-publisher page; no existing rule_2_source_class describes a commercial-publisher page.]",
     "methodology_lens_only": true,
     "corpus_evidence_required": true,
     "source_reference_links": [
      {
       "url": "https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691173122/irrational-exuberance",
       "source_role": "(honest_absence: no existing class fits this source type — operator-ruled, pending future schema decision)",
       "is_primary_url": true,
       "attesting_party": "",
       "attestation_scope": ""
      }
     ],
     "canonical_claims_supported": [
      "Track how popular narratives drive speculative markets, creating tools to detect asset bubbles before systemic financial damage."
     ],
     "does_not_support": [
      "Existence, scale, or importance of any trend found in Apify/LinkedIn posts.",
      "Truth of any specific article thesis without dossier, theme-card, or corpus-bound evidence.",
      "Any regulated, investment, compliance, medical, legal, or product-performance claim unless independently sourced.",
      "Any claim that CoSuite, an advisor, a builder, or a Colab has verified a source unless the verification evidence is recorded."
     ],
     "binding_use": {
      "allowed_binding_types": [
       "Direct",
       "Implied",
       "Inferred"
      ],
      "default_binding_type": "Methodology lens only",
      "requires_source_excerpt": true,
      "requires_corpus_binding": true,
      "corpus_binding_rule": "The dossier/theme-card/post corpus supplies the observed trend; this source supplies only the discovery lens unless separately verified as factual evidence.",
      "extrapolated_use": "Blocked unless the advisor explicitly labels the extrapolation and provides separate support."
     },
     "generation_use": {
      "advisor_use": "allowed",
      "builder_use": "allowed_with_source_reference_link_and_claim_boundary",
      "colab_use": "allowed_as_methodology_lens_after corpus evidence exists",
      "publication_use": "allowed_only_with inline source reference and corpus binding",
      "default_action": "use as methodology lens, not as proof of social trend"
     },
     "thesis_role": "methodology_lens",
     "source_weight": "supporting",
     "colab_routing": {
      "use_as": "thesis_lens",
      "recommended_use_sequence": [
       "1. Detect corpus pattern from sealed dossier/theme-card evidence.",
       "2. Match corpus pattern to this source only by thesis_role/discovery_mechanism.",
       "3. Open source_reference_links or supplied excerpts.",
       "4. Record source claim boundary.",
       "5. Compose original thesis with corpus evidence first and methodology lens second."
      ],
      "must_emit_to_run_record": [
       "source_name",
       "source_reference_links.url",
       "canon_corrected_verification_status",
       "canonical_claims_supported",
       "does_not_support",
       "corpus_binding_reference"
      ]
     }
    }
   ],
   "expansion_note_2026_06_15": "Expanded with brilliant-mind and institutional primary/official sources. New entries include thesis_role, advisor_use, builder_use, colab_use, and claim_boundary fields."
  }
 ],
 "exclusion_rules": [
  "Aggregator and curated-list sites that summarize primary discovery texts (Goodreads, Wikipedia, About.com pages, generic blog posts) do not qualify as primary sources — cite the primary text or its author-controlled site instead.",
  "Press releases, marketing pages, and product launch announcements do not qualify, even when describing genuine discovery work — cite the underlying methodology source.",
  "Consulting firm reports, McKinsey/Deloitte/BCG analyses, and accelerator program collateral do not qualify as primary discovery sources — cite the underlying frameworks they reference.",
  "Modern reformulations or paraphrases of ancient texts (modern self-help books citing Sun Tzu, business books citing Laozi) do not qualify — cite the original translated primary text at archival URLs.",
  "Audio podcasts, YouTube interviews, and conference talk recordings without accompanying transcripts at the speaker's official site do not qualify as cite-able primary sources — cite the speaker's authored work or institutional position page.",
  "AI-generated commentary on discovery methodology (including AI-summarized framework explanations) does not qualify regardless of source quality — cite the human-authored primary text directly.",
  "For Category 7 entries confirmed via search result citations rather than direct URL fetch: the URL is confirmed as the published location of the paper/page but direct page rendering was not achieved this session (rate limit on arXiv). This is noted in verification_method fields and is defensible under §2.6 Verification Freshness Doctrine when the URL identity is multiply confirmed by independent search results citing the URL explicitly."
 ],
 "verification_status_tiers_for_this_library": [
  "Verified primary/official — author-controlled site, publisher page, official institutional page, or canonical archival reproduction with provenance notation. The standard for default inclusion.",
  "Verified primary text — primary text accessible at a stable archival URL (Project Gutenberg, Internet Archive with provenance, accessible PDF at author-permitted location). Equal weight to Verified primary/official for canon-compliance purposes.",
  "Partial — accessible reproduction without author-controlled or publisher-controlled provenance, or where access may require account/borrow. Acceptable in the library with the verification_note field documenting the limitation explicitly.",
  "Search-confirmed — URL confirmed by multiple independent search results citing the URL explicitly this session; direct page fetch not achieved due to rate limit. Recorded with verification_method field. Category 7 arXiv entries (CHECK, Sequential Validation) use this tier.",
  "Excluded — entry where no confirmable primary source met the rules. Recorded in the gaps field of the relevant category per RULE 3."
 ],
 "schema_extensions_for_this_library": [
  "region_context — preserved from source spreadsheet, indicates the region and subdomain where the discovery originated (e.g., 'Japan / Lean operations', 'United States / Behavioral economics'). Useful for diversity-of-lineage analysis at runtime.",
  "discovery_mechanism — short attributed name of the discovery method or principle the entry exemplifies (e.g., 'Genchi genbutsu', 'Falsification', 'Continuous discovery habits').",
  "fifteen_word_value_statement — exactly-15-word distillation of the discovery's operational value, validated for length on the source spreadsheet.",
  "current_innovation_use_value — short statement of current applicability to fintech, medical care, or operational-system design.",
  "quantum_acceleration_vector — forward-looking annotation mapping the discovery to specific quantum computing, sensing, or communication capabilities. NOT canon-binding evidence; preserved for the eventual Quantum Utilities phase referenced in CoSuite_Definition_R2.",
  "geographic_diversity_target_served — for Category 7 entries, names which required geographic target the entry satisfies.",
  "sub_domain — for Category 7 entries, names which of the four sub-domains the entry primarily addresses.",
  "cosuite_relevance — for Category 7 entries, names the specific canon or pipeline component the entry supports.",
  "thesis_role — how this source helps downstream notebooks build a constructive article or dossier thesis.",
  "advisor_use — when an advisor should invoke the source as an interpretive discovery lens.",
  "builder_use — how a builder prompt should force source-aware structure.",
  "colab_use — how notebooks may apply the source to external corpus trends without relying on model memory.",
  "claim_boundary — what the source does not prove and what must be separately verified.",
  "source_weight — core, supporting, contextual, cautionary, or candidate weighting for source selection."
 ],
 "canon_binding": {
  "registry_version": "R9-aligned",
  "universal_entry": "CANONICAL 00 R9",
  "core_canons": [
   "CANONICAL 00 R9",
   "CANONICAL 35 R8",
   "CANONICAL 37 R5",
   "CANONICAL 38 R5",
   "CANONICAL 19 R7",
   "CANONICAL 14 R3",
   "CANONICAL 50 R2"
  ],
  "task_canons": {
   "article": [
    "CANONICAL 17 R2",
    "CANONICAL 18 R1",
    "CANONICAL 36 R2"
   ],
   "linkedin_campaign": [
    "CANONICAL 32 R3",
    "CANONICAL 39 R4"
   ],
   "video_script": [
    "CANONICAL 32 R3",
    "CANONICAL 39 R4"
   ],
   "strategic_brief": [
    "CANONICAL 46 R1",
    "CANONICAL 14 R3",
    "CANONICAL 45 R3"
   ],
   "external_source_analysis": [
    "CANONICAL 45 R3",
    "CANONICAL 46 R1"
   ],
   "rewrite": [
    "CANONICAL 44 R2",
    "CANONICAL 17 R2"
   ],
   "lead_analysis_engagement": [
    "CANONICAL 32 R3",
    "CANONICAL 39 R4"
   ],
   "discovery_analysis": [
    "CANONICAL 48 R1"
   ],
   "type_5_repost_source": [
    "CANONICAL 32 R3",
    "CANONICAL 39 R4"
   ]
  },
  "load_time_activation_contract": "Loading this library binds the agent to the following: (1) The session enters through CANONICAL 00 R9 — task classification with Document Format declaration runs at Step 1, canon activation with Central Contribution declaration runs at Step 2, and Steps 3 through 6 enforce per-call prompt construction, self-validation parsing with halt-on-failure, run-record persistence, and delivery permits. (2) The canons listed in core_canons and task_canons govern all content produced from this library — style per CANONICAL 35 R8, evidence per CANONICAL 37 R5 (with Rule 6.4 notebook-context pre-generation enforcement across the three required surfaces), voice per CANONICAL 38 R5, agent guardrails per CANONICAL 19 R7 (including §2.1.1 input-validation HALT, §2.2.1 named-entity-from-training-data prohibition, and §2.4.1 silent-bypass enforcement), semantic binding bands per CANONICAL 14 R3 (with §3.5 specifying where binding records live in notebook and conversational contexts), context governance per CANONICAL 50 R2. (3) This is the source library for CANONICAL 48 R1 Discovery Analysis — when the active task type is Discovery Analysis, this library is the corpus or the corpus's source-of-record for methodology references, and CANONICAL 48 R1 governs the analytical work. (4) This is also the source library for CANONICAL 39 R4 TYPE 5 Repost discovery-source injection — every TYPE 5 repost's discovery source must come from an entry in this library; training-data plausibility does not satisfy CANONICAL 19 R7 §2.2.1. The thesis-relevance test required by CANONICAL 39 R4 binds to a discovery-library entry that the operator has registered. (5) Fabrication-flag protocol activates against any entry whose author-controlled URL, publisher page, or institutional page cannot be confirmed — the flag must be recorded before inclusion, not suppressed. (6) Gaps recorded in gap_surfacing are generation inputs, not omissions — honest absences are named and carried into content as honest absences. The Sergei Korolev exclusion in category_5 is the canonical demonstration of this discipline. (7) The vocabulary registered in vocabulary_registration is the reader's operative vocabulary for discovery-domain content — agents maintain noun continuity per CANONICAL 35 R8 Rule 23 and do not silently substitute synonyms. (8) The five schema_extensions_for_this_library fields (region_context, discovery_mechanism, fifteen_word_value_statement, current_innovation_use_value, quantum_acceleration_vector) are generation-relevant metadata; they may be referenced in prose but do not substitute for the canon's evidence requirement on the entry itself. (9) Category 7 entries confirmed via search-result URL citation (not direct fetch) use the Search-confirmed verification tier. This is a defensible use of §2.6 Verification Freshness Doctrine when URL identity is multiply confirmed.",
  "last_updated": "2026-06-09 (conformed; 19 R4->R6, 45 R2->R3 corrected against live oracle)"
 },
 "gap_surfacing": {
  "governing_canon": "CANONICAL 37 R5 Rule 3 — honest absence over inferred presence; CANONICAL 19 R7 fabrication boundary",
  "protocol": "When a category_target yields no confirmable primary source meeting the exclusion_rules, record the gap explicitly in the benchmark library's gaps field for that category. Do not infer a source. Do not substitute a secondary source without the partial-verification caveat. Do not leave the category silently empty. The agent names the absence; the operator resolves whether to accept the absence or direct a targeted retrieval run.",
  "partial_coverage_protocol": "Discovery-domain partial coverage uses a three-state model that accommodates the multi-millennium provenance range: (1) verified-primary-or-official — author-controlled site, publisher page, official institutional page, or canonical archival reproduction with provenance notation. The default state for entries clearing the exclusion_rules. (2) verified-primary-text — primary text accessible at a stable archival URL (Project Gutenberg, Internet Archive with provenance, accessible PDF at author-permitted location). Equal canon-weight to verified-primary-or-official. (3) targeted-but-absent — high-value source named in category_target that could not be confirmed. resolution_flag TARGETED_ABSENT. required field absence_reason drawn from: URL not resolvable, document not accessible at author-controlled or publisher-controlled site, document only accessible behind paywall without author-permitted reproduction, only secondary or aggregator references located. The Sergei Korolev Chief Designer Methodology entry in category_5 was recorded as TARGETED_ABSENT and is preserved as the canonical demonstration of this discipline.",
  "required_fields_on_gap_entry": [
   "category_id",
   "gap_description",
   "search_attempted",
   "honest_absence_confirmed"
  ],
  "required_fields_on_targeted_but_absent_entry": [
   "category_id",
   "source_name",
   "absence_reason",
   "resolution_flag"
  ],
  "fabrication_flag": "Any entry that cannot be confirmed at an author-controlled site, publisher page, official institutional page, or canonical archival reproduction must be flagged FABRICATION_RISK before inclusion. The agent records the flag; the operator resolves it. Suppression of a FABRICATION_RISK flag is a CANONICAL 19 R7 §2 violation. The FABRICATION_RISK flag and its disposition are written to the run record per CANONICAL 00 R9 Step 5 — the flag is auditable evidence the discipline ran. For multi-millennium-provenance sources where authorship is contested or where the canonical translation matters more than the original (e.g., translations of Sun Tzu, Laozi, Musashi), the flag attaches to the translation/edition, not the underlying authorship; the entry records which translation is cited.",
  "known_gaps_this_pass": [
   {
    "category_id": "category_7_governed_system_architecture",
    "gap_description": "Charles University Prague (Eastern Europe) — ufal.mff.cuni.cz formal methods or NLP governance primary page",
    "search_attempted": false,
    "honest_absence_confirmed": false,
    "resolution_flag": "TARGETED_ABSENT",
    "absence_reason": "Category_target names Charles University Prague (ufal.mff.cuni.cz) as an Eastern European target. Not fetched this session due to session scope constraints. Operator should direct targeted retrieval to confirm a specific research group page and relevant work.",
    "priority": "Medium — Eastern European geographic diversity target not yet served by Category 7"
   },
   {
    "category_id": "category_7_governed_system_architecture",
    "gap_description": "IIT Bombay CS (India) — cse.iitb.ac.in formal methods or AI governance primary page",
    "search_attempted": false,
    "honest_absence_confirmed": false,
    "resolution_flag": "TARGETED_ABSENT",
    "absence_reason": "Category_target names IIT Bombay CS as an Indian target. Not fetched this session due to session scope constraints.",
    "priority": "Medium — India geographic diversity target not yet served by Category 7"
   }
  ]
 },
 "vocabulary_registration": {
  "governing_canon": "CANONICAL 35 R8 Rule 23 — Vocabulary Continuity",
  "note": "These nouns are the reader's operative vocabulary for discovery-domain content. Agents generating content from this library maintain noun continuity per CANONICAL 35 R8 Rule 23. Silent substitution of synonyms is prohibited. Grouped by role for paragraph-scale tracking. Discovery-domain vocabulary is wider than other libraries because it spans classical strategy, scientific method, modern product methodology, regional innovation, frontier science, and (as of this pass) governed system architecture — the same operational concept appears under different names across lineages, and the canon discipline requires consistent naming within a single artifact rather than substitution across the lineage's terminology.",
  "operative_nouns": {
   "discovery_methods": [
    "discovery",
    "observation",
    "experimentation",
    "falsification",
    "hypothesis",
    "validation",
    "iteration",
    "build-measure-learn",
    "continuous discovery",
    "genchi genbutsu",
    "Wardley map",
    "PDSA cycle",
    "expected-value reasoning",
    "narrative economics",
    "scenario planning",
    "statechart",
    "formal verification",
    "model checking",
    "datasheet",
    "governance-by-design",
    "empirical induction",
    "customer development",
    "validated learning",
    "value proposition canvas",
    "Wardley mapping",
    "PDSA",
    "bounded rationality",
    "commons governance",
    "innovation measurement",
    "provenance",
    "AI risk management",
    "dataset datasheet"
   ],
   "discovery_outputs": [
    "principle",
    "framework",
    "methodology",
    "leverage point",
    "feedback loop",
    "operational pattern",
    "design pattern",
    "discovery artifact",
    "primary text",
    "primary source",
    "canonical reproduction",
    "thesis role",
    "claim boundary",
    "source lens",
    "constructive thesis",
    "innovation measurement standard",
    "provenance record",
    "dataset documentation"
   ],
   "lineage_anchors": [
    "Sun Tzu",
    "Laozi",
    "Miyamoto Musashi",
    "Taiichi Ohno",
    "Leonardo da Vinci",
    "Pascal",
    "Ada Lovelace",
    "Karl Popper",
    "Donella Meadows",
    "Don Norman",
    "Herbert Simon",
    "Daniel Kahneman",
    "Amos Tversky",
    "Claude Shannon",
    "Alan Turing",
    "Albert-Laszlo Barabasi",
    "Eric Ries",
    "Teresa Torres",
    "Marty Cagan",
    "C.K. Prahalad",
    "Navi Radjou",
    "Devi Shetty",
    "Eric Topol",
    "Tim Berners-Lee",
    "Satoshi Nakamoto",
    "David Harel",
    "Virginia Dignum",
    "Adi Shamir",
    "Timnit Gebru",
    "Anqi Shao",
    "Francis Bacon",
    "Blaise Pascal",
    "Steve Blank",
    "Alexander Osterwalder",
    "Melissa Perri",
    "Simon Wardley",
    "Muhammad Yunus",
    "Elinor Ostrom",
    "W. Edwards Deming",
    "Katalin Karikó",
    "Drew Weissman",
    "Emmanuelle Charpentier",
    "Jennifer Doudna",
    "David Baker",
    "Demis Hassabis",
    "John Jumper",
    "Leslie Lamport"
   ],
   "discovery_artifacts": [
    "Notebooks",
    "primary text",
    "Nobel lecture",
    "Turing Award citation",
    "whitepaper",
    "framework",
    "open-source publication",
    "institutional position page",
    "author-controlled site",
    "archival reproduction",
    "arXiv preprint",
    "peer-reviewed commentary"
   ]
  },
  "prohibited_substitutions": [
   {
    "replace": "ideation",
    "with": "discovery"
   },
   {
    "replace": "brainstorming",
    "with": "discovery (or name the specific method: genchi genbutsu, Wardley mapping, etc.)"
   },
   {
    "replace": "research",
    "with": "discovery or experimentation (whichever the source describes)"
   },
   {
    "replace": "best practice",
    "with": "operational pattern or principle (with the lineage anchor named)"
   },
   {
    "replace": "Eastern philosophy",
    "with": "name the specific lineage: Taoist (Laozi), military-strategic (Sun Tzu), swordsmanship (Musashi), or Zen"
   },
   {
    "replace": "Western methodology",
    "with": "name the specific lineage: scientific method (Popper), bounded rationality (Simon), behavioral economics (Kahneman/Tversky), continuous discovery (Torres)"
   },
   {
    "replace": "innovation",
    "with": "discovery (when describing the methodology) or innovation (when describing the output)"
   },
   {
    "replace": "AI safety paper",
    "with": "name the specific paper by author and title (e.g., Gebru et al. Datasheets for Datasets; Shao AI hallucinations framework)"
   }
  ]
 },
 "expansion_revision": "R2-canon-corrected-brilliant-minds",
 "thesis_role_taxonomy": {
  "problem_reframer": "Recasts a noisy or vague corpus signal into a sharper problem statement.",
  "observation_discipline": "Forces direct observation, close reading, field evidence, or situation assessment.",
  "experimentation_standard": "Turns claims into hypotheses, tests, falsification paths, or iteration discipline.",
  "systems_lens": "Explains feedback, delays, network effects, leverage points, constraints, or emergence.",
  "customer_validation_engine": "Forces assumptions into customer discovery, interviews, MVPs, value tests, or outcome evidence.",
  "value_architecture": "Connects jobs, pains, gains, constraints, and capabilities into a usable value thesis.",
  "innovation_measurement": "Distinguishes invention, implementation, diffusion, adoption, and measurable innovation.",
  "institutional_design": "Explains governance, incentives, commons, transaction costs, accountability, and checks.",
  "frontier_science_anchor": "Maps new science or technology to current practical consequences and limits.",
  "provenance_and_governance": "Anchors audit trails, source lineage, risk management, human review, and formal verification."
 },
 "corrected_on": "2026-06-15",
 "scope_note_canon_corrected": "This corrected version treats the discovery file as a brilliant-minds methodology and thesis-construction source library. It is independent of LinkedIn post scraping. Apify/dossier/post materials supply corpus evidence; this library supplies historical, scientific, product-discovery, innovation, frontier-technology, and governed-system lenses that may be applied only with source-reference links, claim boundaries, and corpus binding.",
 "canon_conformance_design": {
  "purpose": "Make every discovery-library entry consumable by advisors, builders, and Colab notebooks without relying on model memory.",
  "core_corrections": [
   "Embed source_reference_links inside each entry.",
   "Separate primary text, official institutional source, third-party attestation, scholarly reference, archive reproduction, and candidate source roles.",
   "State canonical_claims_supported and does_not_support for each entry.",
   "Block candidate, unverified, and missing-URL entries from builder/Colab/publication use until verified.",
   "Require source excerpt and corpus binding before a brilliant-minds lens becomes part of a publishable thesis.",
   "Preserve honest absences rather than silently promoting context sources to proof."
  ],
  "canon_requirements_addressed": {
   "CANONICAL_37_R5": "Verified Source Library discipline: source class, primary/official URL or scoped attestation, supported claim, source boundary.",
   "CANONICAL_19_R6": "Named entities and verification claims must trace to context-provided source references, not training data.",
   "CANONICAL_14_R3": "Each entry carries binding-use controls, claim-boundary records, and source/corpus distinction.",
   "CANONICAL_48_R1": "Discovery analysis requires a named corpus; this library provides methodology lenses, not standalone corpus evidence.",
   "CR_1_R3": "Agents must re-read available context and quote/verify before relying on an entry."
  }
 },
 "required_entry_schema_canon_corrected": {
  "source_reference_links": "Array of source objects containing URL, source_role, attestation_scope, supports_claims, does_not_support, verification_status, verified_on, and verification_method.",
  "canonical_claims_supported": "Claims this source can support when source-reference and excerpt requirements are satisfied.",
  "does_not_support": "Claims this source cannot support; prevents methodology laundering into corpus proof.",
  "binding_use": "Allowed semantic binding types and source/corpus excerpt requirements.",
  "generation_use": "Advisor, builder, Colab, and publication use gates.",
  "methodology_lens_only": "True unless the entry is itself a corpus artifact. Discovery sources generally interpret corpus evidence; they do not supply it.",
  "corpus_evidence_required": "True for article/dossier generation from SI batches."
 },
 "verification_status_tiers_for_this_library_corrected": [
  "verified_or_attested_prior_session — source URL and status are recorded in the JSON; advisor/Colab must still open or use supplied extract before publication.",
  "search_confirmed_prior_session — URL identity was search-confirmed; use for planning, not publication, until source excerpt is captured.",
  "candidate_requires_verification — may remain in the library as a target but is blocked from builder, Colab and publication use.",
  "unverified_context_only — may guide research planning only; not a source lens for generation.",
  "blocked_missing_url — no generation use until a source_reference_link is added."
 ],
 "third_party_attestation_policy": {
  "principle": "Third-party attestations are acceptable only when their scope is recorded and not over-read.",
  "required_fields_per_attestation": [
   "url",
   "source_role",
   "attesting_party",
   "attestation_scope",
   "supports_claims",
   "does_not_support",
   "verification_status",
   "verified_on",
   "verification_method"
  ],
  "examples": {
   "nobelprize.org": "Official institutional attestation of prize/facts/background; does not replace primary authored work unless the claim is only about the prize or official background summary.",
   "amturing.acm.org": "Official ACM/Turing attestation of computing contribution; publication-specific claims still require a publication source when available.",
   "britannica.com_or_SEP": "Third-party scholarly/reference context; useful for named-entity grounding, but not default primary proof."
  }
 },
 "runtime_use_contract_for_advisor_builder_colab": {
  "advisor": "May use verified/attested entries as thesis lenses only after naming source_reference_links and claim boundaries. Must flag candidate/unverified entries as verification tasks.",
  "builder": "Must not generate from an entry unless source_reference_links exist and generation_use.builder_use is not blocked.",
  "colab": "Must emit source_reference_links, canon_corrected_verification_status, and corpus_binding_reference for every source lens used in dossier/article construction.",
  "publication_gate": "Must reject an artifact that cites a discovery entry without inline source URL, corpus binding, and human-review status."
 },
 "canon_citation_correction_2026_07_05": {
  "work_order": "W3 — discovery-structure review, operator-directed 2026-07-05",
  "corrected": [
   "CANONICAL 19 R6 -> R7 (6 occurrences: core_canons registry; activation text; TYPE 5 repost binding rule; gap_surfacing governing_canon; FABRICATION_RISK rule; category-3 doctrinal reference). R7 supersedes R6 additively (adds section 2.8 Tool-Use Capability Verification Gate); all cited sections (2, 2.1.1, 2.2.1, 2.4.1, 2.6.1) carry forward.",
   "CANONICAL 38 R4 -> R5 (2 occurrences: core_canons registry; activation text). R5 supersedes R4 additively (adds APPLICABILITY - PRODUCT ROUTING AND EXCLUSION; no rule modified or removed). Note: 38 R5 excludes CoSuite AM audit-memo output by product type; this library's 38 binding applies to SI narrative tasks only."
  ],
  "preserved_as_historical": [
   "One 'CANONICAL 19 R4 section 2.2.1 named-entity correction' reference inside an entry's correction record - a dated record of a correction performed under 19 R4 at the time. Preserved per CANON_VERSION_TRUTH_TABLE precedent (historical record, not drift)."
  ],
  "oracle": "CANON_VERSION_TRUTH_TABLE.md LIVE column + on-disk canon headers read 2026-07-05 (38 R5 header verified this session; truth-table T3 row for 38 pending its own update)."
 }
}